New Jersey Courts See Little Impact From Coronavirus as Officials Continuing Monitoring for the Virus
A handful of other jurisdictions have seen their court routines disrupted as a result the coronavirus, but court activities in New Jersey's state and federal courts are going on as scheduled.
March 09, 2020 at 03:07 PM
4 minute read
State and federal courts in New Jersey are keeping close tabs on the progression of the coronavirus, but so far it has had little impact on regular court routines.
In the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, the coronavirus has not brought about any significant changes in operations, but the administration of the District of New Jersey and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit are monitoring the situation, said Chief Judge Freda Wolfson.
Disinfectant supplies have been distributed to court staff, and employees are being advised to stay home if they feel sick, said Wolfson.
"Nothing has changed yet. We're all being vigilant," said Wolfson, who said it was too soon to tell if the District of New Jersey will institute a policy like the one adopted Monday by the Southern District of New York.
The Southern District's new policy bars courthouse admission to anyone who has traveled to China, South Korea, Japan, Italy or Iran in the past 14 days. Each of those countries is currently dealing with an outbreak of the virus.
Also denied entry is anyone who resides with, or had close contact with, someone who visited those countries, as well as anyone who has been diagnosed with the virus or been in close contact with someone diagnosed.
Federal courts in western Washington state on Friday said they are suspending all civil and criminal matters requiring an in-court appearance due to an outbreak there. The order, in effect at least until March 31, does not impact judges' considerations of civil or criminal matters that can be resolved on court filings without oral argument. The courthouses in Seattle and Tacoma remain open.
More than a dozen deaths in the U.S., the bulk of them in Washington state, have been attributed to the coronavirus outbreak, as the number of infected patients globally soared past 100,000 Friday.
Meanwhile, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on Friday said it is canceling en banc hearings this week.
If the virus becomes more severe in New Jersey, judges, courtroom deputies and law clerks could begin working from home, and some proceedings, such as settlement conferences, could be conducted by phone, Wolfson said.
In New Jersey's state court system, out-of-state business travel by court staff is getting close scrutiny, and travel to locations substantially impacted by the virus is not allowed, said Pete McAleer, spokesman for the Administrative Office of the Courts. But all court events are being held as scheduled, McAleer said.
"We continue to monitor the situation closely to determine if additional precautions are necessary," McAleer said.
In the event that conditions worsen, the state judiciary is readying plans to conduct virtual and telephonic proceedings in Superior Court, Tax Court, the Appellate Division, and Supreme Court, if necessary. Such proceedings pose challenges because of the need to create a record and allow for public access, and the court's technical staff is working on those details, according to a notice to the bar issued Monday.
In addition, the judiciary is making plans for dealing with any persons appearing in court who claim they were diagnosed with or exposed to the coronavirus, the notice to the bar states. The court staff is making plans for notifying local health departments of such cases, according to the notice.
New Jersey's judiciary is in regular communication with the state Department of Health for guidance on any adjustments to court procedures needed to protect court employees and the public, the court said in a statement.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDemocrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal With GOP
Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
DOJ: TD Bank Agrees to Pay $3B Over Anti-Money Laundering Program Violations
2 minute readWhat Judicial Nominations Could Look Like Under a President Harris or Trump
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250