Coronavirus Threat Closes All Faegre Drinker Offices
Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath on Tuesday closed all offices for the day amid concerns that personnel in Washington, D.C., were potentially exposed. The firm's 22 offices include Florham Park and Princeton offices where nearly 100 attorneys combined practice.
March 10, 2020 at 02:09 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath on Tuesday closed all of its offices for the day amid concerns that personnel in its Washington, D.C., office were potentially exposed to COVID-19.
The firm has 22 offices total, including one each in Florham Park and Princeton. There are nearly 100 attorneys combined practicing at the New Jersey offices, according to the firm's website.
None of the firm's lawyers and staffers have tested positive for the coronavirus, but a person who attended a recent event at Faegre Drinker's Washington office did, the firm said in a statement. As a result, the firm's executive leadership decided Monday to close the firm's offices.
"Because the health and safety of our personnel and clients is our top priority, Faegre Drinker is temporarily closing its D.C. offices. As a measure of caution, our leadership team has also taken the step of closing our global offices on March 10 while we evaluate this situation," the firm said in its statement.
Faegre Drinker has 158 people working across two offices in D.C., according to the firm's website. It has two locations there because Faegre Baker Daniels and Drinker Biddle & Reath, which officially merged into one firm last month, each had a D.C. office of its own.
In its statement, Faegre Drinker touted the fact that its lawyers, consultants and professionals "are equipped with the required technology to work remotely and remain ready and available to assist clients." However, a source told The American Lawyer that the firm did ask its staff to postpone all client meetings that were originally scheduled for Tuesday.
It wasn't immediately clear how long Faegre Drinker would keep its offices closed. The firm in its statement said, "As we evaluate when to re-open offices, we will keep the health and safety of our personnel, clients, visitors and the public at the front of our minds."
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan closed its New York office—where more than 200 of its lawyers are based—for the week after one of its partners contracted the coronavirus. Earlier this month, lawyers at the small Midtown Manhattan law firm of Lewis and Garbuz were sent home after one of the firm's lawyers tested positive for the coronavirus.
A growing number of firms have created working groups to advise clients on how the virus will impact them, while at the same time canceling partner retreats and restricting travel. Those cancellations have hit firms ranging from Osborne Clarke to Faegre Drinker.
A Faegre Drinker spokeswoman said Monday, before the offices were closed, that the firm had decided to postpone its partners and principals retreat, which was scheduled to take place in Miami this week.
At the same time, the spread of the virus is testing the remote-work capabilities of various Big Law firms, who have begun allowing their lawyers and staff in certain offices to work from home if they're feeling sick or uncomfortable.
Faegre Drinker's full statement:
"Faegre Drinker's executive leadership team was notified on the evening of March 9 that an attendee at a recent event in our Washington, D.C. office has since tested positive for COVID-19, commonly known as the coronavirus. Because the health and safety of our personnel and clients is our top priority, Faegre Drinker is temporarily closing its D.C. offices. As a measure of caution, our leadership team has also taken the step of closing our global offices on March 10th while we evaluate this situation.
"No Faegre Drinker personnel have tested positive for coronavirus – this is simply a precautionary measure while we evaluate the appropriate path forward. Our attorneys, consultants and professionals are equipped with the required technology to work remotely and remain ready and available to assist clients. As we evaluate when to re-open offices, we will keep the health and safety of our personnel, clients, visitors and the public at the front of our minds."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All$113K Sanction Award to Law Firm at Stake: NJ Supreme Court Will Consider 'Unsettled Law' Frivolous Litigation Question
4 minute readWhich Outside Law Firms Are Irreplaceable, and Which Should Have Gotten the Ax Years Ago?
4 minute readLargest Law Firms: New Jersey and Firmwide Attorney Count
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1UPS Agrees to $45M Settlement With SEC Over Valuation Claim
- 2For Midsize Law Firms, Curbing Boys-Club Culture Starts with Diversity at the Top
- 3Southern California Law Firms Boast Industry-Leading Revenue, Demand Through Q3
- 4AI: An Enhancement, Not a Replacement for Attorneys
- 5Fowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250