New Jersey Relaxes Mandate for In-Person CLE as Coronavirus Spreads
New Jersey lawyers may take all of their CLE credits through formats other than in-person attendance under an order issued Tuesday by Chief Justice Stuart Rabner.
March 11, 2020 at 01:32 PM
3 minute read
The face-to-face component of New Jersey's continuing legal education requirement is being relaxed in order to minimize exposure to the COVID-19 respiratory virus.
New Jersey lawyers must take 24 credits of continuing legal education from approved providers in each two-year period, and ordinarily half of those credits must be earned by in-person attendance at approved events. But with the virus spreading throughout the nation, lawyers may take all of their CLE credits through formats other than in-person attendance under an order issued Tuesday by Chief Justice Stuart Rabner.
The in-person credits may instead be taken by approved courses transmitted by video, audio, remote viewing, online presentations, webinars, webcasts, podcasts, satellite simulcasts, teleconferences, video conferences, or internet self-study.
Rabner's order was issued in response to recommendations for social distancing issued by the New Jersey Department of Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as a way to minimize exposure and transmission of the coronavirus.
One New York attorney who is admitted in New Jersey, and whose request for a waiver from New Jersey's in-person CLE requirement was denied before the order was signed, was relieved to learn that Rabner approved the waiver. That attorney, who did not want to be named, said his CLE deadline is fast approaching and he was preparing to take a series of courses over two days to fulfill his quota. The prospect of being in a roomful of lawyers at CLE events is "too alarming right now," given the virus' impact on New York's legal community, he said.
New York's legal circles have already seen inroads from the virus. Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan announced Sunday that one of its lawyers tested positive for the coronavirus, and another lawyer from the firm of Lewis and Garbuz tested positive on March 3.
Elsewhere, some other jurisdictions also changed their CLE requirements in light of the coronavirus. In Georgia, which requires 12 credits of study per year, a rule mandating that six of those credits be attained through attendance at an in-person event has been relaxed, and attorneys can earn all 12 hours through self-study, in-house, or online seminars.
The State Bar of Texas has also made changes to its CLE program. Any attorney who doesn't want to attend live Texas Bar CLE events will have free access to online videos of those programs, said a notice issued Tuesday. The Texas Bar also is allowing lawyers to cancel their registrations and get a refund.
Some providers of remote CLE programs may be seeing a health crisis as a business opportunity. Austin, Texas-based CLE Companion said more lawyers are completing their requirements online because of the coronavirus threat. Company founder Kristin Davis said in a press release Monday that instead of attending an in-person CLE event, attorneys "should consider protecting themselves and their livelihood by taking a smarter approach and staying put, either at the office or working remotely from home."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All$113K Sanction Award to Law Firm at Stake: NJ Supreme Court Will Consider 'Unsettled Law' Frivolous Litigation Question
4 minute readWhich Outside Law Firms Are Irreplaceable, and Which Should Have Gotten the Ax Years Ago?
4 minute readLargest Law Firms: New Jersey and Firmwide Attorney Count
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Publication of Information Regarding Client Matters
- 2The State of Cost Recovery — Post COVID
- 3Why Is It Becoming More Difficult for Businesses to Mandate Arbitration of Employment Disputes?
- 4The Whys and Hows of a Mediator’s Proposal
- 5Litigators of the Week: A Trade Secret Win at the ITC for Viking Over Promising Potential Liver Drug
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250