Judge Alberto Rivas Censured for Nude Photos Comment, Relinquishes His Leadership Role
A censure is the harshest punishment a judge can receive short of a suspension.
March 23, 2020 at 06:32 PM
3 minute read
Middlesex County Assignment Judge Alberto Rivas has been censured for making inappropriate courtroom remarks and has voluntarily relinquished his leadership position, the Administrative Office of the Courts said Monday.
Rivas will serve as a judge in the Civil Division, and Chief Justice Stuart Rabner has appointed Michael Toto, criminal presiding judge in Middlesex County, to the position of assignment judge.
In opting to censure Rivas, the court adopted the recommendation of the Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct. Under New Jersey's judicial discipline system, a censure is the harshest punishment a judge can receive short of a suspension.
Rivas, who was self-represented in the disciplinary case, was accused in an August 2019 complaint of humiliating and demeaning parties in his courtroom in a dispute involving a husband, wife and the husband's girlfriend.
In that case, the girlfriend filed an order to show cause seeking the return of a set of photos depicting her in various stages of undressing, which she claimed were possessed by the wife of her boyfriend.
At one point in the hearing, according to the documents, Rivas expressed doubt about the girlfriend's statement that she did not know where the wife was employed.
Rivas, the documents said, responded, "Baloney. That's not true. If you're screwing him—let's be frank now, because I should not be wasting judicial resources on this kind of malarkey. If you have been screwing him for these years, there's no question that you know where she works. That's how affairs work."
Rivas also said to the girlfriend, according to documents, "I will give you a piece of advice. … The only person you should be sending naked pictures to are [sic] Hugh Hefner. He will pay you $100,000 for the use of them."
In a presentment in February, the ACJC disclosed that Rivas' conduct was "aggravated considerably" by two private reprimands, in 2013 and 2014, for improper treatment of litigants.
Rivas could not be reached for comment on Monday.
Toto, 62, has served as a Superior Court judge in Middlesex County for 14 years. He was named presiding judge of the criminal division in 2017 and also served in the civil and family divisions. Before that, Toto served as a municipal judge for 17 years. He was the presiding judge of the Jamesburg Municipal Court and also served in the East Brunswick and Manalapan courts. Toto is a graduate of Rutgers University Law School.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Sad That We Have to Do This': Senate Judiciary Passes Bill Temporarily Addressing Public Notice Crisis
3 minute readSenate Judiciary Committee OKs Retired Judge for New Role, Advances 6 Superior Court Nominees
4 minute readDispute Over Failure to Accommodate Disability Ends in $900K Settlement
3 minute readLowenstein Sandler Boosts White-Collar, Business Litigation Group With Deputy AG Hire
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250