Gov. Murphy Sued for Firing Turnpike Lawyers Hired During Christie Administration
The plaintiffs were informed their positions were considered "policymaking and advisory" jobs, and that they were being terminated as a result of the change in administrations.
March 25, 2020 at 03:29 PM
4 minute read
Three Republican lawyers working at the New Jersey Turnpike Authority have filed a civil rights lawsuit accusing Gov. Phil Murphy's administration of firing them because of their political affiliation.
The lawyers were hired during Gov. Chris Christie's administration and spent their days on routine tasks such as drafting real estate contracts rather than formulating policy, the suit claims. But soon after Murphy took office in January 2018, he installed Diane Scaccetti as acting commissioner of the Turnpike Authority, and she "initiated a partisan, vengeful plan to oust all NJTA law department employees who were Republican and/or perceived supporters of former Governor Chris Christie, regardless of employment level," the suit claims.
The plaintiffs—Nicholas DePalma, Paul Macchia and Maulik Sanghavi—received letters on Feb. 26, 2018, from Mary-Elizabeth Garrity, the agency's director of human resources, saying their positions were considered "policymaking and advisory" jobs and that they were being terminated as a result of the change in administrations. They were instructed to leave the premises the same day.
"For me, that letter is a smoking gun, if, at the end of the day it's proven that they are not policymaking individuals," said Marc Garbar of the Law Offices of Brandon Broderick in River Edge, who represents the plaintiffs.
DePalma, Macchia and Sanghavi lacked the authority to make final decisions, and they tackled assignments that merely required a neutral, objective application of already-established laws and regulations of the NJTA, their suit said. The suit was filed in Monmouth County Superior Court in February and removed to U.S. District Court in Trenton on Tuesday.
Macchia and Sanghavi were hired in 2015, and DePalma in 2016. At the time of their hiring, they were known in the agency as Republicans or perceived as supporters of Christie, the suit claims.
Turnover is routine among top policymakers at state agencies when a new governor is elected, but previous administrations have not gone after midlevel employees such as the plaintiffs, said Garbar. Besides DePalma, Macchia and Sanghavi, there were one or two other attorneys at the Turnpike Authority who were let go under the same circumstances, said Garbar. He says he believes Murphy knew that the plaintiffs were being dismissed.
While working at the NJTA, DePalma, Macchia and Sanghavi were closely supervised and held to strict productivity requirements, were not permitted to enter the quarters occupied by policymakers at agency headquarters, and were discouraged from speaking with them, the suit claims. The plaintiffs were not at-will employees but were protected by duly executed contracts that barred discrimination based on political affiliation, the suit claims.
The plaintiffs bring claims under federal civil rights law based on violations of the First Amendment. They seek lost wages, compensatory and emotional distress damages, noncompensatory damages, punitive damages, and attorney fees. They also claim violations of New Jersey civil rights law.
Murphy's administration faced similar claims in another suit, filed in July 2019 on behalf of six employees of the School Development Authority, who claimed they were fired to make room for political appointees. That case is pending in Mercer County Superior Court.
Thomas Abbate of DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin in Paramus represents the Turnpike Authority, Scaccetti, Garrity and other members of the Turnpike Authority Board of Commissioners, who were also named as defendants. Abbate did not return a call about the suit, and a Turnpike Authority spokesman also did not return a call about the case. The Attorney General's Office, which represents Murphy, declined to comment
.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNJ Attorney General's Office Announces Major Shake-Up for Executive Leadership Team
4 minute read'Bewitched by the Technology': $300K to Settle Faulty Facial Recognition
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250