Middlesex Jury Awards $5 Million for Minor's Injuries in Truck Crash
A Middlesex County jury awarded $5 million on March 10 to a boy, now 9, who suffered severe burns in a motor vehicle accident. The verdict, in N.P.…
March 27, 2020 at 09:00 AM
5 minute read
A Middlesex County jury awarded $5 million on March 10 to a boy, now 9, who suffered severe burns in a motor vehicle accident. The verdict, in N.P. v. Tristate Trucking, brings the total recovery in the case to $6.7 million after two other defendants settled before trial for $1.25 million and $450,000.
The boy, identified as N.P., who lives with his family in Neptune, was riding in the rear seat of a pickup truck on Route 896 in Glasgow, Delaware, on Aug. 19, 2016, when the vehicle was rear-ended by a tractor-trailer driven by Charles Bolton, an employee of Tristate Trucking of Baltimore. N.P.'s aunt and uncle were in the front seat of the pickup, which was waiting at a red light when Bolton failed to stop, causing the pickup truck to burst into flames. N.P. suffered second- and third-degree burns over 26% of his body and he underwent skin graft surgeries. He sustained burns to his back, buttocks and legs, said Norman Hobbie of Hobbie, Corrigan & DeCarlo in Eatontown, who represented N.P., along with Jacqueline DeCarlo of the same firm.
N.P. also suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder and sees a psychologist, according to Hobbie.
A traffic camera at the intersection recorded the accident. Bolton gave multiple reasons for failing to stop, claiming at different times that he blacked out, that the truck's brakes failed, and that another driver cut him off, Hobbie said.
The suit named as defendants Bolton, Tristate, and the company's principal, James Lighty. Also named as defendants were W.B. Mason of Brockton, Massachusetts, an office supply company whose goods were being transported in Bolton's truck, and A. Duie Pyle Inc. of West Chester, Pennsylvania, which booked Tristate to transport Mason's cargo.
The defendants stipulated to liability, causation and permanency. On Feb. 15 W.B. Mason agreed to pay $450,000, and A. Duie Pyle agreed to pay $1.25 million, after mediation with Kenneth Grispin of Javerbaum, Wurgaft, Hicks, Kahn, Wikstrom & Sinins in Springfield, a former Superior Court judge.
The $5 million verdict was entered jointly against Bolton, Tristate and Lighty after a three-day trial before Middlesex County Superior Court Judge Lisa Vignuolo.
During trial, there was expert testimony from a psychiatrist about N.P.'s emotional trauma, but the defense did not cross-examine the expert, Hobbie said.
It's unclear how much will be collected from the defendants because Tristate has only $740,000 in insurance coverage, although a separate insurance coverage action involving the trailer portion of Tristate's truck is still pending, Hobbie noted.
Bolton was represented at trial by Sean Hart of Kent McBride in Cherry Hill. Tristate and Lighty were represented by Peter Rossi of Cipriani & Werner in Woodbridge. W.B. Mason was represented by Michael Lynch of the Law Offices of Linda S. Bauman in East Windsor. A. Duie Pyle was represented by Robert Gunning of Morrison Mahoney in Parsippany. They did not respond to calls about the case.
— Charles Toutant
|$640K for Apartment Fall in Essex
Mendoza v. Mt. Prospect Holdings Inc.: A women who sustained a fractured ankle in a fall in the hallway of her Newark apartment building settled her Essex County suit on Jan. 20 for $640,000.
According to counsel, on Dec. 10, 2015, plaintiff Jacquelyn Mendoza, 26, a bank teller, slipped and fell in the hallway of her apartment building in Newark. She suffered an ankle fracture. Mendoza sued the property's owner, Mt. Prospect Holdings Inc, and its related entities, 445-449 Mt. Prospect Holding Inc., FD Realty Group and FDG Management.
Mendoza alleged that Mt. Prospect was negligent for allowing a dangerous condition to exist. Mendoza claimed that she exited her apartment and began walking in the hallway, when her foot slipped on a loose tile, causing her to fall. She claimed Mt. Prospect failed to properly secure the tile flooring to the subfloor and failed to perform periodic inspections of the floor.
The defense maintained that Mt. Prospect had no notice of any loose tiling. The defense contended that Mendoza was negligent, since she was familiar with the flooring and had walked over the floor countless times.
Mendoza sustained a comminuted fracture of her right tibia and a right bimalleolar fracture. She underwent open reduction and internal fixation in which plates and screws were implanted. During physical therapy, an abscess and infection at the surgery site required antibiotic treatment. Mendoza underwent a second surgery to remove some of the hardware. In 2019 she was diagnosed with post-traumatic arthritis in her right ankle. Mendoza claimed that her loss of range of motion in her right ankle resulted in a club foot, which disrupted her gait and left her unable to walk long distances or climb stairs.
She claimed she can no longer exercise or perform other activities. She also contended that she has difficulty caring for her five children. She had a medical lien of $49,919 and lost wages of about $15,000, the suit alleged.
The defense contended that Mendoza made a good recovery, has no tenderness and is able to return to her pre-accident condition with no residual disability.
In the Jan. 20 settlement, Mt. Prospect's insurer, AmTrust Financial Services Inc., agreed to pay $640,000, from a policy that provided $1 million of coverage.
Michael J. Hanus of Hanus & Parsons in Middletown represented Mendoza. Denise M. Bush of Hannum Feretic Prendergast & Merlino in New York represented Mt. Prospect.
*Editor's Comment: This report is based on information that was provided by plaintiff's counsel. Defense counsel did not respond to the reporter's phone calls.
— Adapted from VerdictSearch, reported by Aaron Jenkins
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTurning the Tables: Defense Litigators Embrace Lawsuits, Alleging Fraud at Plaintiffs Shops
6 minute readTitle Insurance Agency on Hot Seat Over Homebuyer Fees, Alleged Kickbacks
3 minute readNJ Justices Mull Insurer's Duty to Defend Employer's Negligence Claim in Workers' Comp Dispute
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Maryland Atty Pushes Judge to Grant Discovery in Reverse Discrimination Suit Against King & Spalding
- 2Thompson Coburn Hit With Class Action Over Data Breach
- 3The Coming of Trump's Judicial Picks Spurs Liberals to Press for Biden's
- 4'We Should Be Pragmatic': Meet the Possible Next FTC Chair
- 5Bank of America's Cash Sweep Program Attracts New Legal Fire in Class Action
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250