Modell's Bankruptcy Pause 'Extraordinary Relief Under Extraordinary Circumstances'
The proceedings provide a glimpse of how COVID-19 has further upended the already reeling brick-and-mortar retail industry.
March 28, 2020 at 02:11 PM
7 minute read
A federal judge in Newark has suspended the bankruptcy of sporting goods retailer Modell's until April 30, buying the retailer time to liquidate its stores after this month's COVID-19 restrictions temporarily shuttered its going-out-of business stores as shoppers and foot traffic disappeared.
In a March 27 teleconference hearing, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Vincent Papalia of the District of New Jersey largely agreed—with some modifications—to a consensual agreement hammered out earlier this week between Modell's, lenders, landlords and other creditors.
The ruling, the first known one of its kind pertaining to bankruptcies, allows Modell's to suspend bankruptcy proceedings until April 30, as well as not having to pay April rent to landlords.
"The order specifically reserves the right for Modell's to make the argument that parties are not entitled to be paid on account of those reserved expenses," said Eric Horn, a bankruptcy attorney at A.Y. Strauss in Roseland, who has been closely watching the case and listened in on the teleconferences. "Although not expressly stated in the order, the expense that the parties are referring most to has to do with rent. The argument … is that since Modell's cannot operate the stores due to governmental restrictions, they should not be required to pay rent."
Another hearing is scheduled for April 30 on whether to extend the 30-day suspension, which is half of what Modell's originally asked for.
"It was a good day for all the stakeholders to hit the pause button and then reconvene on April 30," said Michael Sirota of Cole Schotz in Hackensack, counsel for Modell's, in a phone call afterward. "I don't view this as a win or a loss. It's extraordinary relief under extraordinary circumstances.
"We are fortunate that Judge Papalia invested an enormous [amount of] time while the courthouse is closed and entertained everyone's position," Sirota said.
The ruling provides a glimpse of how the novel coronavirus has upended another aspect of the embattled brick-and-mortar retail industry, which before the pandemic was already reeling from online retailers such as Amazon taking market share.
In securing the extension, Sirota, co-chairman of his firm's bankruptcy and corporate restructuring department, said his client relied on an infrequently used bankruptcy law provision—Section 305 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code—which allows the suspension of a bankruptcy case if it is in the interest of the bankruptcy estate and creditors.
On top that, Papalia also exercised his discretion to grant the temporary reprieve and temporary suspension of the case given the extraordinary circumstances, Sirota added.
Modell's Sporting Goods—with 134 stores nationally, including 33 in New Jersey, and several in Pennsylvania and Delaware—was in the midst of closing them out after filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on March 11.
Five days later, New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy issued an executive order mandating all nonessential retail to close as a preventive measure against the rapid spread of the novel coronavirus. Only essential retailers, such as grocery stores, pharmacies and gas stations, among others, are allowed to continue to operate during the COVID-19 state of emergency.
A similar order came down in Pennsylvania from Gov. Tom Wolf on March 15.
Modell's, founded by Morris Modell in 1889 and described in court documents as "America's oldest family-owned and operated retailer of sporting goods, athletic footwear, active apparel, and licensed fan gear," suddenly found itself hosting closeout sales at stores that shoppers could no longer venture into because of the pandemic. With zero cash flow, it let go all its employees and distribution center staff. The retailer has operated with a skeletal crew with about a dozen people from its corporate office, according to Sirota.
On March 23, Modell's filed an emergency application with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey to suspend the liquidation process, stating: "Notwithstanding the Debtors' best laid plans COVID-19 has prevented the Debtors from conducting the robust liquidation sales that seemed possible just one week ago; it has left the Debtors with no choice but to temporarily 'mothball' their operations to preserve value, with the hope that they can recommence operations in the near future and successfully liquidate inventory for the benefit of all parties-in-interest."
Mitchell Modell, chief executive officer and president of Modell's Sporting Goods, issued a statement following the granting of the suspension: "I want to personally thank Judge Vincent F. Papalia for being so understanding in these most difficult and unprecedented times. … I also appreciate the collaborative efforts of the vendors and landlords in reaching this temporary solution."
A two-hour teleconference hearing on March 25 with 78 people involved, including counsel for Modell's, the creditors' committee, prepetition lenders and various landlords, ended without a resolution. It concluded with Papalia issuing a continuance for the morning of March 27, and saying if the parties failed to reach a consensual agreement at the close of that hearing, that he would issue a ruling. However, the judge also noted the parties were caught in "unprecedented times warranting the entry of extraordinary relief."
The hearing itself, originally scheduled for federal court in Newark, was made by a teleconference call after the courthouse was ordered to close earlier in the week due to an employee testing positive for COVID-19. The March 27 hearing, with about 50 calling in this time, yielded the agreement for the 30-day suspension and Modell's being allowed to hold off on paying April rent.
"We told the landlords, 'it's not as if we don't want to pay you for … occupancy [of] your space, but we are deprived through state, county and municipal mandates not to go and use your space,'" Sirota said.
Lawrenceville-based Joseph Lemkin, a shareholder and member of Stark & Stark's bankruptcy and creditors' rights group, represents a landlord who owns properties with three Modell's stores in central and northern New Jersey and New York. He said landlords are fearful they will be left holding the bag indefinitely.
"There are different provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, and Section 365-D3 requires tenants to pay landlords for their commercial leases," Lemkin said after the March 27 hearing.
"The court will give you a little bit of a break, but ultimately you have to catch up within 60 days. By the 60th day, you have to be current on post-bankruptcy payments, including to landlords who own the buildings," Lemkin said.
The scheduled April 30 hearing on whether to continue the suspension if necessary was cutting it close for May rent, said Lemkin, who represents creditors nationwide in bankruptcy and other insolvency proceedings, including Pier 1 in Delaware, Fairway in New York, Borden Dairy in Delaware, and Dean Foods in Texas, among others.
"From my perspective, it's not a position you want to be in," Lemkin said. "The understanding is, that all the [Modell's] liquidations will all be done in April, and the landlords would get their space back by May 1."
"But no one knows if anyone can go into the stores by April 30," he added.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGibbons Attorneys File WARN Violations Against Christmas Tree Shops Owners for Short Layoff Notices
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250