BAR REPORT - Capitol Report
First electronic voting session advances COVID-19-related bills
March 30, 2020 at 08:02 AM
3 minute read
First electronic voting session advances key bills
Amid the COVID-19-imposed state-wide lockdown of non-essential businesses, the Assembly acted last Thursday in the first remote voting session authorized by the newly passed law permitting public bodies to meet remotely during a public health emergency or state of emergency. Key bills were advanced that would greatly impact the lives of New Jersey residents and access to justice in the state.
Remote Notary Bill
A-3903 (Downey/Houghtaling/Swain) passed the Assembly with overwhelming support. It would supplant a bill, presently sitting on the governor's desk, to permit notaries to perform services remotely using communication technology to record the act both visually and audibly. The new bill limits the duration of remote notary services to the duration of the public health emergency and state of emergency declared under Executive Order 103. The bill on the governor's desk, A-3864, had a 90-day effective date, which would significantly delay any usefulness during the COVID-19 time period. A-3903 removes the waiting period, becoming effective immediately upon the governor's signature. However, in its current form the bill only permits notaries public to notarize documents remotely, and still excludes wills and codicils; certain Uniform Construction Code (UCC) documents and records governed by a statute, regulation or other rule of law governing adoptions, divorces or other matters of family law.
The New Jersey State Bar Association (NJSBA) urged the bill's sponsors and Assembly leadership to consider amendments expanding the legislation to include any officials authorized to perform oaths and affidavits by statute, and to include wills and codicils.
Property Tax Relief
A-3902 (Wimberly/Coughlin/Armato) permits the extension of certain deadlines applicable to local government units under emergency circumstances. The NJSBA supports this measure as part of its overall efforts to extend the deadlines of property tax appeals because it resolves lingering procedural questions about deadlines before the county boards of taxation. The bill empowers the Department of Community Affairs, in consultation with the director of the Division of Taxation, to legally extend the tax deadlines in connection with the county boards. Earlier, the Supreme Court issued an order extending deadlines for property tax appeals before the county boards.
Both bills head to the Senate, which has not yet scheduled a voting session.
Other bills considered by the Assembly include:
- A-3900 (Sumter/Chaparro/Quijano)/S-2304 (Sweeney/Scutari/Sumter) expands the scope of the state's temporary disability insurance (TDI) so workers may obtain TDI or family leave insurance (FLI) benefits by expanding the definition of "serious health condition" to include an illness caused by an epidemic of a communicable disease, a known or suspected exposure to a communicable disease, or efforts to prevent the spread of a communicable disease, and eliminates the current one-week waiting period for disability benefits. The bill heads to the governor for his signature.
- A-3901 (Chiaravalloti/Kennedy/Speight) permits professional and occupational licensing boards to reactivate the licensure of certain people to practice the profession or occupation in New Jersey, as deemed necessary to protect public health, safety and welfare. The bill heads to the Senate.
- A-3904 (Burzichelli/Schepisi/Lampitt) permits the use of virtual or remote instruction to meet the minimum 180-day school year requirement in order to qualify for state aid. The bill heads to the Senate.
This is a status report provided by the New Jersey State Bar Association on recently passed and pending legislation, regulations, gubernatorial nominations and/or appointments of interest to lawyers, as well as the involvement of the NJSBA as amicus in appellate court matters. To learn more, visit njsba.com.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAppellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
4 minute readChiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
5 minute read'A Mockery' of Deposition Rules: Walgreens Wins Sanctions Dispute Over Corporate Witness Allegedly Unfamiliar With Company
Trending Stories
- 1'That Decision was Wrong:' Federal Judge Rethinks Consumer Protection Class Certification
- 2Bar Report — Dec. 2, 2024
- 3The Impact of Erlinger on Predicate Felony Sentencing Statutes
- 4To Ease Partner Pay Tensions, Some Law Firms Are Seeking 'Middle Ground' in Transparency
- 5How Legal Aid and Tech Collaboration Can Bridge the Justice Gap
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250