Law Grads May Temporarily Practice Under Supreme Court Order
"At this challenging time, the public has a continuing and growing need for legal services in many critical areas," Chief Justice Stuart Rabner stated. "The Court also recognizes that, without a means to pass the bar and obtain a law license, qualified students who expect to graduate this spring may lose job offers, be unable to find legal work, and otherwise suffer financial hardship."
April 06, 2020 at 04:06 PM
4 minute read
With bar exams pushed off to the fall, law school graduates anticipating to graduate next month will be allowed to temporarily practice law under the supervision of experienced attorneys under an order signed Monday by Chief Justice Stuart Rabner.
The 2020 bar exam, originally scheduled for July, has been postponed until the fall due to the novel coronavirus pandemic.
The court order is meant not only to help fulfill legal needs during the state's prolonged public health emergency, but also to buffer the economic blow for recent graduates.
Several states, including New York, have said they are considering similar moves in light of bar exam complications because of COVID-19, but New Jersey looks to be the first state to have made the supervised practice arrangement official.
"At this challenging time, the public has a continuing and growing need for legal services in many critical areas," Rabner stated in a release accompanying the order. "Newly admitted lawyers can help meet that need. The Court also recognizes that, without a means to pass the bar and obtain a law license, qualified students who expect to graduate this spring may lose job offers, be unable to find legal work, and otherwise suffer financial hardship."
The pandemic's impact on the legal community has been widespread. Firms and courthouses have shuttered with employees working remotely and all new jury trials in New Jersey suspended, among the venues hit hard.
Under Monday's order, graduates will, under supervision of attorneys in good standing, be able to: enter appearances, draft legal documents and pleadings, provide legal services to clients, engage in negotiations and settlement discussions, and provide other services.
First, they must apply to take the first exam scheduled after graduation, or qualify for a single extension, and earn certification from the Supreme Court Committee on Character, and submit all needed materials and fees, before they can practice, according to the order.
Rabner said the Supreme Court had consulted with the deans of New Jersey's law schools: Kimberly Mutcherson and David Lopez, co-deans of Rutgers Law School; and Kathleen M. Boozang, dean of Seton Hall University School of Law in Newark.
They "appreciate the careful and expeditious work of the New Jersey Supreme Court to enable the class of 2020 to enter the profession and begin their legal careers," the three deans said in a joint statement on Monday. "We look forward to working with the Court to facilitate the administration of the bar exam, whenever that becomes possible."
The order encourages attorneys to volunteer to help the Committee on Character expedite the review process.
The temporary ability to practice law will lapse if a graduate does not sit for the first bar exam scheduled after graduation, unless granted an extension, or if the graduate does not pass the exam, according to the order.
Graduates who cannot sit for the first exam can apply to the New Jersey Board of Bar Examiners for a single extension if they can establish a specific showing of personal hardship under the order. No further extensions will be granted, the order says.
Rabner said in order to prepare for the exam, 2020 graduates serving as law clerks in the New Jersey judiciary will be granted one week of additional leave. Individual judges will have discretion to allow a second week of leave, he added.
The order also encourages supervising attorneys, law firms, and other legal employers to offer 2020 graduates the same accommodation, according to Monday's release.
On March 9, New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy declared a statewide public health emergency and proceeded to virtually shut down all businesses and schools through a series of executive orders meant to curb the spread of the respiratory disease.
As of Tuesday afternoon, the death toll from COVID-19 had risen to 1,232 in New Jersey, according to Murphy, who gave his daily coronavirus briefing to the media, this time wearing a face covering for the first time. The number of statewide cases as of Tuesday was 44,416, second only to New York, which has emerged as the epicenter of the respiratory disease.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMeet the Judges: Senate Confirms 7 Superior Court Nominees in Final 2024 Session
3 minute readAG Had No Authority to Take Control of Paterson PD, Appellate Division Says
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Top Five Florida Verdicts of 2024
- 2The Evolution of a Virtual Court System
- 3New Acquitted Conduct Guideline: An Analysis
- 4Considering the Implications of the 2024 Presidential Election for Jurors in White Collar Cases
- 52024 in Review: Judges Met Out Punishments for Ex-Apple, FDIC, Moody's Legal Leaders
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250