Bracing for Turbulence, Lowenstein Sandler Holds Back Some Partner Pay
Despite the move, the firm's executive board said it was "pleased" with the current level of client activity during the coronavirus pandemic.
April 08, 2020 at 07:18 PM
3 minute read
Lowenstein Sandler confirmed Wednesday it was temporarily holding back some compensation for equity partners, joining a slew of Am Law 200 firms that have responded to the financial uncertainty raised by the coronavirus pandemic with pay cuts, layoffs and furloughs.
The 300-lawyer firm, based in New Jersey, said that although it was doing well financially—it said March 2020 was its second-strongest financial month in the last two years—it had decided to pause a portion of planned distributions for equity partners. Above the Law first reported the cuts.
"Given our strong performance in the first quarter of 2020, we were in a position to make a substantial additional distribution to our partners at the end of March; however, to ensure our firm's continued financial strength in the face of the uncertainty posed by the coronavirus, our executive board determined that prudence dictated we hold back those funds until we know more," a firm representative said in a statement.
The firm had healthy growth in 2019 that may soften the financial blow of the coronavirus pandemic, at least for now: The firm took in more than $343 million in gross revenue last year, an 11% jump from 2018, while revenue per lawyer increased to $1,116,000.
The firm has 50 equity partners that will be affected by its latest move, according to ALM data. Lowenstein Sandler also clarified that base draws received by all partners would stay the same, meaning the firm's 59 nonequity partners would be unaffected by the cut.
"We want to clarify that the firm has not reduced partner draw, but is holding additional distributions that would otherwise be available to its equity partners in order to further strengthen its very solid financial position," the firm said. "Our executive board continues to closely monitor performance at every level, and we are pleased by the level of client activity that we are seeing across our practice groups through the first week of April."
Read More
Pay Cuts, Layoffs, and More: How Law Firms Are Managing the Pandemic
Lowenstein's Earnings Spike Amid Gains in Head Count, Revenue Per Lawyer
'Relieved to Be Home': Lowenstein Sandler Partner Back in NJ After Guatemala Closes Borders
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNeighboring States Have Either Passed or Proposed Climate Superfund Laws—Is Pennsylvania Next?
7 minute readAn Overview of Proposed Changes to the Federal Rules of Procedure Relating to the Expansion of Remote Trial Testimony
15 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
- 2CFPB Resolves Flurry of Enforcement Actions in Biden's Final Week
- 3Judge Orders SoCal Edison to Preserve Evidence Relating to Los Angeles Wildfires
- 4Legal Community Luminaries Honored at New York State Bar Association’s Annual Meeting
- 5The Week in Data Jan. 21: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250