NJ Recognizes Alternative Treatment Centers as 'Essential' Businesses
In a continuing effort to secure the safety and health of its residents, New Jersey has recognized ATCs that dispense medical marijuana as 'essential,' and issued regulatory waivers to improve patient access.
April 14, 2020 at 01:30 PM
5 minute read
In the wake of the coronavirus (COVID-19) public health emergency, New Jersey has taken unprecedented measures to marshal its available resources to secure the safety and health of its residents. First, the State created the New Jersey Coronavirus Task Force, chaired by the Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Health, to coordinate the State's efforts to prepare for and respond to the public health hazards associated with COVID-19. Governor Murphy declared a State of Emergency on March 9, 2020. In addition, gatherings of individuals, such as parties, celebrations, or other social events are cancelled, work-from-home mandates are in place where feasible for both essential and non-essential employees, and an emphasis on practicing social distancing when in public went into effect. In short, New Jersey's emergency response has and will continue to adapt to this rapidly evolving emergency.
On March 21, 2020, Executive Order 107 (the Order) became effective. The Order, among its various mandates, recognizes certain retail businesses as "essential" to daily life and others as "non-essential." Under the Order, essential businesses are authorized to continue to operate to the public, and non-essential businesses have been ordered to be shut down. Fortunately, alternative treatment centers (ATCs) "that dispense medical marijuana" have been categorized as "essential." Other "essential" businesses include grocery stores, convenience stores, pharmacies, pet stores, liquor stores, hardware and home improvement stores, and medical supply stores.
Pursuant to the Order, essential retail businesses that remain open are required to implement and abide by social distancing guidelines as recommended by the CDC and DOH. These guidelines include reasonable efforts to keep customers at least six feet apart, and to sanitize common surfaces such as door handles, counter tops, elevator buttons and surfaces. Additionally, wherever practicable, essential retail businesses must provide pickup services outside or adjacent to their stores for products that customers order online or by phone.
To improve patient access to ATCs and to facilitate the adherence to the terms of the Order, on March 23, 2020, the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) announced regulatory waivers and changes to facilitate safe ATC operations during the pandemic. The waivers include:
- Waiving the requirements of N.J.A.C. 8:64-7.9 and N.J.A.C. 8:64-13.6. This waiver permits ATCs to: |
- Dispense cannabis to qualified patients and caregivers in their cars on the exterior premises of the ATC, including any parking lots and adjacent sidewalks.
- Have patients order their products in advance; provided the ATC has appropriately labeled the products prior to dispensing on the exterior of their premises.
- Provide to patients and caregivers a pick-up time in order to reduce traffic around the ATC.
- Conduct an in-person visual verification (through a car window) of the patient's registry ID card prior to dispensing (in order to avoid handling the ID card).
ATCs must continue to log all transactions and inventory in the registry in accordance with N.J.A.C. 8:64-9.3, N.J.A.C. 8:64-9.9 and other corresponding rules, and all transactions must still be conducted in a secure and monitored manner in accordance with N.J.A.C. 8:64-9.7.
In addition, if the ATC intends to dispense to patients and caregivers on the exterior of the ATC, the ATC must notify the municipality and the local police department in which it is located.
Lastly, prior to dispensing via curbside delivery, the ATC must provide the NJDOH with Standard Operating Procedures for the following:
• Taking orders, verifying registry ID and authorization, and taking payment;
• Logging the transaction in the registry and ATC inventory; and
• Security needed to accommodate the curbside delivery.
- Waiving the requirements of N.J.A.C. 8:64-11.4. This waiver permits an ATC to forgo the patient self-assessment of pain or primary qualifying symptom prior to the dispensing of medical marijuana, except that such an assessment is required for new patients, only if requested by the new patient or his or her caregiver and the assessment may be conducted by phone.
- Waiving the requirements of N.J.A.C. 8:64-1.2. This waiver reduces the $100 registration fee for an application for issuance or renewal of a registry identification card for all caregivers to $20 (but not the fee for patients). Caregivers are still restricted to acting as a caregiver for one patient.
In addition, on March 24, 2020, the NJDOH released temporary guidelines to enable faster on-boarding of new ATC employees. In particular, the NJDOH is now permitted to offer provisional authority for ATC employee applicants for a period of up to three months, provided certain conditions are met. These temporary guidelines can be found at the following link: Temporary Guidance Here.
We recommend that ATCs closely monitor the effects this COVID-19 pandemic has on their patients, and, if needed, communicate with state regulators as to any improvements that are necessary to properly care for patients.
Lisa Gora is an attorney at Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, in Woodbridge, who practices on the Cannabis Law, Health Law and Corporate teams. She also serves as secretary of the NJSBA's Cannabis Law Committee. Michael F. Schaff is co-chair of the Cannabis Law, Health Law and Corporate teams at the firm. He also serves as co-chair of the NJSBA's Cannabis Law Committee.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All$10 Million Settlement Reached for Baby Injured by Disconnected Ventilator
3 minute readJury Awards Horizon $2.4 Million for Fraudulent Billing Against 3 NJ Health Care Providers
2 minute readVirtua Drug Tests Pregnancy Patients Without Consent, NJ Attorney General Alleges in New Suit
3 minute readNJ Supreme Court Considers Ability to Add Nonparty Doctors to Med Mal Verdict Sheets
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Commission Confirms Three of Newsom's Appellate Court Picks
- 2Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
- 3GEICO, Travelers to Pay NY $11.3M for Cybersecurity Breaches
- 4'Professional Misconduct': Maryland Supreme Court Disbars 86-Year-Old Attorney
- 5Capital Markets Partners Expect IPO Resurgence During Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250