BAR REPORT - NJSBA survey shows significant impact of COVID-19, especially on solo and small firms
NJSBA legal community survey indicates significant impact by the COVID-19 pandemic, especially on solo and small firms.
April 20, 2020 at 08:01 AM
3 minute read
The majority of attorneys who responded to a recent New Jersey State Bar Association (NJSBA) online survey said their practices have been significantly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Of the 93% who reported the pandemic was causing an impact, more than 60% said the impact was significant and nearly 33% said it was moderate.
The attorneys reported they have been affected in a range of ways, including financial hardship because of a drop in clients and clients' inability to pay; difficulty adapting to working from home; difficulty conducting legal work because of the physical shutdown of the courts; and the stress and strain to their mental and physical health and that of their staff and clients.
"Working from home is difficult, and the lack of access to the courts and having to try to do things remotely is really difficult," wrote one respondent.
Another said, "working from home with my very young children here and homeschooling at the same" are the biggest challenges.
Many others said they are frustrated over not being able to meet face-to-face with clients and staff.
"Telephone and video conferences are better than nothing," wrote one respondent, "but not nearly as good as in person."
More than 75% said they were experiencing financial strain, and of those, nearly 36% said the strain was significant and nearly 40% said it was moderate. About 7% said their practice had not been impacted. Many said making payroll was a challenge, and they were concerned about having to lay off their staff.
Their comments paint a grim picture.
"We have been cut off from income for two weeks. With courts closed until May and police not making new arrests, we are looking at bankruptcy," one respondent wrote.
"Litigation is slowing to a halt, and commercial clients don't have money to pay bills," another wrote.
Another wrote, "the phones are silent."
Some said they were furloughed, laid off or feared being laid off. Attorneys who were in the job market were worried they would not be able to find jobs.
"The job market is not looking very good, and the majority of the legal job fairs are cancelled. As a new graduate and newly barred (2019), I am very concerned about my prospects," one wrote.
That said, the majority—88%—said they have the resources they need to serve their clients.
The vast majority of the respondents—nearly 80%—are solo practitioners or work in small firms. Nearly 11% work in medium-size firms with 15 to 40 attorneys, and about 10% work in firms with more than 40 attorneys.
About 325 attorneys answered the NJSBA's eight-question survey. The Association is analyzing the results to determine the best way to serve its members through programming and advocacy.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNeighboring States Have Either Passed or Proposed Climate Superfund Laws—Is Pennsylvania Next?
7 minute readAn Overview of Proposed Changes to the Federal Rules of Procedure Relating to the Expansion of Remote Trial Testimony
15 minute readTrending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250