BAR REPORT - NJSBA survey shows significant impact of COVID-19, especially on solo and small firms
NJSBA legal community survey indicates significant impact by the COVID-19 pandemic, especially on solo and small firms.
April 20, 2020 at 08:01 AM
3 minute read
The majority of attorneys who responded to a recent New Jersey State Bar Association (NJSBA) online survey said their practices have been significantly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Of the 93% who reported the pandemic was causing an impact, more than 60% said the impact was significant and nearly 33% said it was moderate.
The attorneys reported they have been affected in a range of ways, including financial hardship because of a drop in clients and clients' inability to pay; difficulty adapting to working from home; difficulty conducting legal work because of the physical shutdown of the courts; and the stress and strain to their mental and physical health and that of their staff and clients.
"Working from home is difficult, and the lack of access to the courts and having to try to do things remotely is really difficult," wrote one respondent.
Another said, "working from home with my very young children here and homeschooling at the same" are the biggest challenges.
Many others said they are frustrated over not being able to meet face-to-face with clients and staff.
"Telephone and video conferences are better than nothing," wrote one respondent, "but not nearly as good as in person."
More than 75% said they were experiencing financial strain, and of those, nearly 36% said the strain was significant and nearly 40% said it was moderate. About 7% said their practice had not been impacted. Many said making payroll was a challenge, and they were concerned about having to lay off their staff.
Their comments paint a grim picture.
"We have been cut off from income for two weeks. With courts closed until May and police not making new arrests, we are looking at bankruptcy," one respondent wrote.
"Litigation is slowing to a halt, and commercial clients don't have money to pay bills," another wrote.
Another wrote, "the phones are silent."
Some said they were furloughed, laid off or feared being laid off. Attorneys who were in the job market were worried they would not be able to find jobs.
"The job market is not looking very good, and the majority of the legal job fairs are cancelled. As a new graduate and newly barred (2019), I am very concerned about my prospects," one wrote.
That said, the majority—88%—said they have the resources they need to serve their clients.
The vast majority of the respondents—nearly 80%—are solo practitioners or work in small firms. Nearly 11% work in medium-size firms with 15 to 40 attorneys, and about 10% work in firms with more than 40 attorneys.
About 325 attorneys answered the NJSBA's eight-question survey. The Association is analyzing the results to determine the best way to serve its members through programming and advocacy.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAppellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
4 minute readChiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
5 minute read'A Mockery' of Deposition Rules: Walgreens Wins Sanctions Dispute Over Corporate Witness Allegedly Unfamiliar With Company
$113K Sanction Award to Law Firm at Stake: NJ Supreme Court Will Consider 'Unsettled Law' Frivolous Litigation Question
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.