Wawa Agrees to Pay Total of $3M in Suit Over Child's Burns From Hot Water
The suit claimed Wawa dispensed the hot water at a dangerous temperature that would immediately cause burns if spilled on flesh and that Wawa knew of the hazard and acted with disregard for the safety of its customers.
April 20, 2020 at 04:54 PM
4 minute read
The family of a small child who allegedly suffered severe burns from hot water at a Wawa convenience store has agreed to a $3 million settlement of the suit in U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.
The settlement, approved by U.S. Magistrate Judge Tonianne Bongiovanni on March 30, calls for payment of $2,550,000 to the child, to be split between a trust and an annunity, and another $450,000 to her mother.
The child, identified in court papers as N.K., was 3 years old when she was injured during a visit to the Wawa store in Neptune, New Jersey, with her mother on April 25, 2018. The mother, Roya Konzman, selected two cups of hot water for tea along with several other items and brought them to the register, where a clerk, who was ringing up the order, knocked over one of the cups of water. The top came off the cup and hot water splashed all over the upper body, arms and torso of N.K. She suffered second- and third-degree burns over 15% of her body.
The suit claimed the hot water, which came from a Cecilware water dispensing machine, was dispensed at a dangerous temperature that would immediately cause burns if spilled on flesh. The suit claimed Wawa knew of the hazard and acted with disregard for the safety of its customers. The injured child's mother also sought compensation for emotional distress that was caused by witnessing the injuries to her daughter and the pain and suffering they caused.
Wawa claimed in its answer to the complaint that, to the extend that its hot tea was served in a hazardous condition that caused the child's injury, the condition was "open and obvious." Wawa also claimed that negligence by the child's mother should bar or limit recovery and that the mother's failure to properly supervise the child should be considered a cause or contributing factor in the accident.
The case prompted talk radio station New Jersey 101.5 to compare the suit against Wawa to the 1994 New Mexico case where McDonald's was ordered to pay Stella Liebeck $640,000 after she spilled hot coffee on her lap.
But the lawyer for the Konzman family, David Mazie, of Mazie, Slater, Katz & Freeman in Roseland, New Jersey, told the radio station that his case rested on a different legal theory from the one in the McDonald's case. That's because the child's injuries were caused by the negligence of an employee, Mazie said. The attorney told the radio station in an interview that water from the Wawa water dispenser was 180 degrees, compared with 104 degrees in a typical shower.
In the order approving the settlement, Bongiovanni signed off on the payment of $14,908 in expenses, $597,150 in legal fees and a health insurance lien for $36,460 from the child's portion of the settlement, with the remaining $1,901,482 being split between a support trust and a structured settlement annunity.
The judge also approved costs of $2,631 in expenses and $149,123 in legal fees from the mother's portion of the settlement, leaving her with net proceeds of $298,246.
Mazie declined to comment on the settlement. Wawa's lawyer, Betsy Ramos of Capehart Scatchard in Mount Laurel, New Jersey, did not respond to a request for comment. Wawa also did not respond to a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All3rd Circuit Strikes Down NLRB’s Monetary Remedies for Fired Starbucks Workers
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250