A New Jersey appeals court has partially reinstated a legal malpractice suit against the law firm Ansell, Grimm & Aaron over a troublesome real estate transaction it was involved in.

The Appellate Division reversed the dismissal of a claim for legal fees and other costs associated with Ansell Grimm’s failure to define a property’s boundaries, finding factual disputes on the record are sufficient to deny the law firm’s motion to dismiss, Appellate Division Judges Jack Sabatino and Arnold Natali Jr. ruled.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]