Class Action Lawsuits Fight Denial of Business Interruption Coverage Over COVID-19
Three class action suits have been filed in the District of New Jersey in recent days on behalf of restaurants that were denied business interruption coverage, and similar suits are popping up in other states as well.
May 06, 2020 at 01:03 PM
4 minute read
Insurance companies are facing lawsuits in New Jersey courts over the denial of business interruption coverage on behalf of establishments that lost revenue due to shelter-in-place policies prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Three class action suits have been filed in the District of New Jersey in recent days on behalf of restaurants that were denied business interruption coverage. Similar suits have been filed in other states as well.
Class action powerhouse firms Carella, Byrne, Cecchi, Olstein, Brody & Agnello; Seeger Weiss; and Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd filed the three New Jersey suits. The latest was filed Tuesday against Chubb Limited, which is headquartered in Warren, and subsidiary Indemnity Insurance Company of North America, by Benito Ristorante, an eatery in Union. The suit is filed on behalf of a nationwide class and New Jersey subclass of businesses with standard Chubb commercial policies that have suffered losses due to stay-at-home orders since March 15.
The same firms filed a similar suit against Chubb on April 20 on behalf of Fiorino Ristorante in Summit and a suit against Cumberland Mutual Fire Insurance Co. on April 29 on behalf of the operator of Cara Mia, a restaurant in Millburn.
Lawyers have already asked the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation to consolidate such suits.
Chubb also faces a similar suit, filed in the Southern District of Florida by the owner of an eatery in Fort Lauderdale. That suit was filed by Podhurst Orseck and Boies Schiller Flexner.
And in the Central District of California, Chubb faces a suit filed by the Simon Wiesenthal Center, a Los Angeles-based nonprofit organization, claiming that a stay-at-home order by Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti forced the organization to furlough and lay off staff as well as cancel fundraising events. The California case was brought by John Houghtaling of Gauthier, Houghtaling.
But Chubb CEO Evan Greenberg has vowed to fight the suits, declaring that making insurance companies pay COVID-19 costs is "plainly unconstitutional."
In the Benito Ristorante case in New Jersey, Chubb's policy language says business interruption insurance covers a disruption of the business that is caused by physical loss or damage to the property by a "covered peril," and that an infectious agent or communicable disease does not count as physical loss or damage.
But the Benito Ristorante suit says Chubb wrongly concludes the policyholder suffered no physical loss or damage under the policy language.
"In fact, applicable case law holds that loss of use of property that has not been physically altered does constitute 'physical loss or damage' for purposes of first-party property insurance, such as that contained in the Policy," the suit claims.
In addition, the suit says the policy language excluding coverage for an infectious agent or communicable disease does not apply because "Plaintiff's, and other class members', losses were not caused by a 'virus, bacterium or other microorganism that induces or is capable of inducing physical distress, illness or disease'. Rather, the efficient proximate cause of Plaintiff's, and other Class Members' losses, were precautionary measures taken by the State of New Jersey to prevent the spread of COVID-19 in the future, not because coronavirus was found in or on Plaintiff's insured property."
Chubb spokesman Jeffrey Zack said in a statement about the business interruption suits,
"As a matter of company policy, we do not comment on specific client claims or pending legal matters. We are doing all we can to help our customers at this time. We are providing discounts for reduced exposures for auto and commercial policies and extending payment terms. We are paying claims for covered losses fairly and promptly. These include many pandemic-related losses in areas such as workers compensation, travel insurance and business interruption where virus and/or pandemic was specifically included. The insurance industry estimates it will pay $100 billion or more in claims related to the pandemic making this the single largest catastrophe in history."
Cumberland Mutual did not respond to a request for comment about the Cara Mia suit.
Sign up for Law.com's Legal Radar to keep up with the latest news and lawsuits in a free, personalized news feed. Track new federal litigation by industry, practice area, law firm, company and region.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Dismisses Suit Over Arbitrators' Role in Scheme to Extract Quick Settlements
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Unanswered Questions on Remote Work Complicate NJ Wage Transparency Law, Litigators Say
- 2DeSantis Appointed Assistant US Attorney to Broward Circuit Court Bench
- 3Thomson Reuters Plans to Spend Big in AI. Here’s How
- 4FactSet Finds New Legal Chief at Financial Data Rival S&P
- 5Midsize Texas Firm Kane Russell Takes Another Step Toward Second-Generation Leadership With New CFO
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250