Class Action Lawsuits Fight Denial of Business Interruption Coverage Over COVID-19
Three class action suits have been filed in the District of New Jersey in recent days on behalf of restaurants that were denied business interruption coverage, and similar suits are popping up in other states as well.
May 06, 2020 at 01:03 PM
4 minute read
Insurance companies are facing lawsuits in New Jersey courts over the denial of business interruption coverage on behalf of establishments that lost revenue due to shelter-in-place policies prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Three class action suits have been filed in the District of New Jersey in recent days on behalf of restaurants that were denied business interruption coverage. Similar suits have been filed in other states as well.
Class action powerhouse firms Carella, Byrne, Cecchi, Olstein, Brody & Agnello; Seeger Weiss; and Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd filed the three New Jersey suits. The latest was filed Tuesday against Chubb Limited, which is headquartered in Warren, and subsidiary Indemnity Insurance Company of North America, by Benito Ristorante, an eatery in Union. The suit is filed on behalf of a nationwide class and New Jersey subclass of businesses with standard Chubb commercial policies that have suffered losses due to stay-at-home orders since March 15.
The same firms filed a similar suit against Chubb on April 20 on behalf of Fiorino Ristorante in Summit and a suit against Cumberland Mutual Fire Insurance Co. on April 29 on behalf of the operator of Cara Mia, a restaurant in Millburn.
Lawyers have already asked the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation to consolidate such suits.
Chubb also faces a similar suit, filed in the Southern District of Florida by the owner of an eatery in Fort Lauderdale. That suit was filed by Podhurst Orseck and Boies Schiller Flexner.
And in the Central District of California, Chubb faces a suit filed by the Simon Wiesenthal Center, a Los Angeles-based nonprofit organization, claiming that a stay-at-home order by Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti forced the organization to furlough and lay off staff as well as cancel fundraising events. The California case was brought by John Houghtaling of Gauthier, Houghtaling.
But Chubb CEO Evan Greenberg has vowed to fight the suits, declaring that making insurance companies pay COVID-19 costs is "plainly unconstitutional."
In the Benito Ristorante case in New Jersey, Chubb's policy language says business interruption insurance covers a disruption of the business that is caused by physical loss or damage to the property by a "covered peril," and that an infectious agent or communicable disease does not count as physical loss or damage.
But the Benito Ristorante suit says Chubb wrongly concludes the policyholder suffered no physical loss or damage under the policy language.
"In fact, applicable case law holds that loss of use of property that has not been physically altered does constitute 'physical loss or damage' for purposes of first-party property insurance, such as that contained in the Policy," the suit claims.
In addition, the suit says the policy language excluding coverage for an infectious agent or communicable disease does not apply because "Plaintiff's, and other class members', losses were not caused by a 'virus, bacterium or other microorganism that induces or is capable of inducing physical distress, illness or disease'. Rather, the efficient proximate cause of Plaintiff's, and other Class Members' losses, were precautionary measures taken by the State of New Jersey to prevent the spread of COVID-19 in the future, not because coronavirus was found in or on Plaintiff's insured property."
Chubb spokesman Jeffrey Zack said in a statement about the business interruption suits,
"As a matter of company policy, we do not comment on specific client claims or pending legal matters. We are doing all we can to help our customers at this time. We are providing discounts for reduced exposures for auto and commercial policies and extending payment terms. We are paying claims for covered losses fairly and promptly. These include many pandemic-related losses in areas such as workers compensation, travel insurance and business interruption where virus and/or pandemic was specifically included. The insurance industry estimates it will pay $100 billion or more in claims related to the pandemic making this the single largest catastrophe in history."
Cumberland Mutual did not respond to a request for comment about the Cara Mia suit.
Sign up for Law.com's Legal Radar to keep up with the latest news and lawsuits in a free, personalized news feed. Track new federal litigation by industry, practice area, law firm, company and region.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All3rd Circuit Strikes Down NLRB’s Monetary Remedies for Fired Starbucks Workers
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1South Florida Attorney Charged With Aggravated Battery After Incident in Prime Rib Line
- 2'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 3Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 4‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 5State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250