Out-of-State Attorneys Allowed Pro Bono Work in NJ Under Court's Order
Chief Justice Stuart Rabner said allowing for pro bono work by out-of-state counsel, including in-house counsel, was another measure to minimize disruption and allow access to the state's court and legal system during the health crisis.
May 07, 2020 at 02:51 PM
3 minute read
The New Jersey Supreme Court has issued an order to allow attorneys not licensed in New Jersey to provide temporary, supervised pro bono assistance to individuals and small businesses impacted by the novel coronavirus pandemic.
The state for weeks has been under a public safety and health emergency declaration by Gov. Phil Murphy.
On Wednesday, the governor extended the executive order declaration for the second time in nearly two months for up to another 30 days.
The order states: "This emergency has resulted in severe disruption to all aspects of society and commerce in New Jersey and has adversely affected the ability of New Jersey residents and small businesses to obtain adequate needed legal services in all instances."
The order, dated Monday and issued with an accompanying notice to the bar dated Wednesday, is effective immediately and in effect until further notice. In it, Chief Justice Stuart Rabner said allowing for pro bono work by out-of-state counsel, including in-house counsel, was another measure to minimize disruption and allow access to the state's court and legal system during the health crisis.
It was the latest measure by the court in dealing with the coronavirus outbreak that has shuttered courthouses, law offices, and suspended or delayed proceedings since early March. Court administrators recently said that about 90% of the judiciary is working remotely, serving tens of thousands of people since mid-March.
In late April, the Supreme Court announced other directives to keep the court system functioning and to minimize backlogs.
On April 24, Rabner issued an omnibus order to resume the operations of some court sessions and activities, while extending the deadline for others.
Just days before that order, Rabner and acting Administrative Director for the Courts Glenn Grant issued updated guidelines on the use of remote proceedings to maintain a seamless flow of court events through video or phone conference.
Under Monday's order, an out-of-state attorney seeking to participate in pro bono work must be licensed in another U.S. jurisdiction, and not be disbarred, suspended from practice, or otherwise restricted from practice in any jurisdiction. The participating attorney must also be supervised by an attorney licensed and in good standing in New Jersey, "either through a legal services or public interest organization or law school clinical or pro bono program certified under R. 1:21-11(b)(1) or (b)(3), or independent of any such organization or program," according to the order.
Such out-of-state counsel must work on a "pro bono basis without compensation, expectation of compensation, or other direct or indirect pecuniary gain to the lawyer," the order said.
Also according to the order, the supervising attorney must file a certification with the Supreme Court regarding all attorneys who provide pro bono assistance and the nature of their assistance.
The order refers questions to Superior Court Clerk Michelle Smith at [email protected] or 609-421-6100.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSocial Media Policy for Judges Provides Guidance in a Changing World
3 minute readBank of America's Cash Sweep Program Attracts New Legal Fire in Class Action
3 minute read'Something Really Bad Happened': J&J's Talc Bankruptcy Vote Under Attack
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 2Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 3Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 4Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 5Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250