Out-of-State Attorneys Allowed Pro Bono Work in NJ Under Court's Order
Chief Justice Stuart Rabner said allowing for pro bono work by out-of-state counsel, including in-house counsel, was another measure to minimize disruption and allow access to the state's court and legal system during the health crisis.
May 07, 2020 at 02:51 PM
3 minute read
The New Jersey Supreme Court has issued an order to allow attorneys not licensed in New Jersey to provide temporary, supervised pro bono assistance to individuals and small businesses impacted by the novel coronavirus pandemic.
The state for weeks has been under a public safety and health emergency declaration by Gov. Phil Murphy.
On Wednesday, the governor extended the executive order declaration for the second time in nearly two months for up to another 30 days.
The order states: "This emergency has resulted in severe disruption to all aspects of society and commerce in New Jersey and has adversely affected the ability of New Jersey residents and small businesses to obtain adequate needed legal services in all instances."
The order, dated Monday and issued with an accompanying notice to the bar dated Wednesday, is effective immediately and in effect until further notice. In it, Chief Justice Stuart Rabner said allowing for pro bono work by out-of-state counsel, including in-house counsel, was another measure to minimize disruption and allow access to the state's court and legal system during the health crisis.
It was the latest measure by the court in dealing with the coronavirus outbreak that has shuttered courthouses, law offices, and suspended or delayed proceedings since early March. Court administrators recently said that about 90% of the judiciary is working remotely, serving tens of thousands of people since mid-March.
In late April, the Supreme Court announced other directives to keep the court system functioning and to minimize backlogs.
On April 24, Rabner issued an omnibus order to resume the operations of some court sessions and activities, while extending the deadline for others.
Just days before that order, Rabner and acting Administrative Director for the Courts Glenn Grant issued updated guidelines on the use of remote proceedings to maintain a seamless flow of court events through video or phone conference.
Under Monday's order, an out-of-state attorney seeking to participate in pro bono work must be licensed in another U.S. jurisdiction, and not be disbarred, suspended from practice, or otherwise restricted from practice in any jurisdiction. The participating attorney must also be supervised by an attorney licensed and in good standing in New Jersey, "either through a legal services or public interest organization or law school clinical or pro bono program certified under R. 1:21-11(b)(1) or (b)(3), or independent of any such organization or program," according to the order.
Such out-of-state counsel must work on a "pro bono basis without compensation, expectation of compensation, or other direct or indirect pecuniary gain to the lawyer," the order said.
Also according to the order, the supervising attorney must file a certification with the Supreme Court regarding all attorneys who provide pro bono assistance and the nature of their assistance.
The order refers questions to Superior Court Clerk Michelle Smith at [email protected] or 609-421-6100.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSocial Media Policy for Judges Provides Guidance in a Changing World
3 minute readBank of America's Cash Sweep Program Attracts New Legal Fire in Class Action
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250