Struck Pedestrian Recovers $675,000 in Hudson County Case
A pedestrian who suffered multiple fractures when he was hit by a vehicle while crossing a street in Jersey City agreed to a $675,000 settlement in…
May 15, 2020 at 09:00 AM
5 minute read
A pedestrian who suffered multiple fractures when he was hit by a vehicle while crossing a street in Jersey City agreed to a $675,000 settlement in his Hudson County suit, Rojas v. Openner, in February.
Jose Rojas, now 33, was crossing Barrow Street in a crosswalk on Nov. 19, 2018, when he was struck and knocked down by a vehicle, driven by Guido Openner and owned by Daklapak USA of Moonachie, that was turning left onto Barrow from York Street, said Joseph Marabondo of Eichen, Crutchlow & Zaslow in Edison, who represented the plaintiff with the firm's Barry Eichen. Rojas claimed Openner disregarded a stop sign, although Openner disputed that claim and said Rojas walked into the path of his vehicle, also contending that lighting in the area made it difficult for him to see the pedestrian, according to Marabondo.
Rojas suffered fractures of the right lower leg and right ankle, and was required to undergo two open reduction and internal fixation surgeries. He is left with a visible limp that is expected to be permanent, Marabondo said.
The case settled Feb. 3, with Openner and Daklapak agreeing jointly to pay the $675,000. The settlement was reached shortly before the case was set for trial, following a second mediation with former Superior Court Judge Raymond Reddin of Hall Booth Smith in Saddle Brook. Payment was made approximately two weeks later, according to Marabondo.
Dennis Loffredo of the Law Office of Linda Baumann in East Windsor represented the defendants. He declined to comment on the case.
— Charles Toutant
|$665K for Test Drive Accident
Castellanos v. JAB Automotive LLC: A woman who claimed she sustained a neck injury in a used car test drive mishap was paid a $665,000 settlement in her Middlesex County suit on March 17.
On June 15, 2016, Sabrina Castellanos, then 34, was test-driving a used sedan owned by dealership JAB Automotive, doing business as JD Byrider, on Route 9 in Old Bridge when the hood of the vehicle flew open. The hood struck the windshield, causing Castellanos' head to snap back and the rear-view mirror to strike her head, according to her attorney, Nehal Modi of the Haddad Law Firm in Woodbridge.
Castellanos was able to slow the vehicle to a stop without any collisions, Modi noted.
The suit claimed the defendants negligently allowed the hood to be unlatched when the test drive began. The suit named the dealership and Fabienne Hansen, a dealership employee who was riding in the passenger's seat during Castellanos' test drive, Modi said.
Castellanos later underwent a one-level cervical fusion in 2018. She worked as a masseuse and stopped working because of the injury, and had not returned to work as of the settlement date, Modi said.
The parties were in discovery and had submitted expert reports when they settled for $665,000 on Feb. 28. The sum was paid March 17. The defendants were covered by Universal Underwriters Insurance Co.
John Goworek of Hendrzak & Lloyd in Parsippany, who represented the defendants, declined to comment on the settlement.
— David Gialanella
|No Cause in Camden Auto Case
Mendez v. Naddeo: A Camden County jury returned a defense verdict in a damages trial in the case of a motorist struck from behind on Jan. 22.
According to counsel, on Aug. 25, 2016, plaintiff Jamey Mendez, 36, a prison guard, was driving on Berlin Road, near its intersection at Browning Lane, in Cherry Hill. While he was stopped, his sport utility vehicle was rear-ended by a car driven by Henry Naddeo. Mendez sued Naddeo. The lawsuit alleged that Naddeo was negligent in the operation of his vehicle. Defense counsel conceded liability. The trial addressed damages.
Mendez claimed that he suffered injuries of his back and neck. Mendez was ultimately diagnosed with a herniation of his C5-6 intervertebral disc, and bulges of his C3-4, C6-7, L1-2, L2-3, L3-4, L4-5 and L5-S1 discs. He was treated by a chiropractor. Mendez's treating orthopedist opined that Mendez suffered permanent injuries to his cervical spine. Mendez testified that he continues to suffer neck stiffness and soreness. A weight lifter, he claimed that he had to stop weight lifting for a few months post-accident, and that when he finally resumed it he was unable to lift the same amount of weight. Additionally, he wakes up each morning with neck stiffness.
The defense questioned the legitimacy of Mr. Mendez's complaints, since Mendez continues to lift significant weights. The defense's expert in orthopedic surgery testified that Mendez's herniation and bulging predated the accident and were degenerative in nature, and that Mendez did not suffer a permanent injury in the accident.
After a two-day trial before Superior Court Judge Michael J. Kassel, the jury on Jan. 22 found by a 6-1 vote that Mendez's injuries were not permanent within the meaning of the verbal threshold.
John L. Aris of Lowenthal & Abrams in Philadelphia represented Mendez and his wife, who lodged a loss-of-consortium claim.
Robert M. Kaplan of Margolis Edelstein in Mount Laurel represented Naddeo.
Editor's Comment: This report is based on information that was provided by plaintiff's counsel. Defense counsel did not respond to the reporter's phone calls.
— Aaron Jenkins, adapted from VerdictSearch reports
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAmid Growing Litigation Volume, Don't Expect UnitedHealthcare to Change Its Stripes After CEO's Killing
6 minute readJudge Approves $667K Settlement Against Independence Blue Cross for Unpaid, Pre-Shift Computer Work
4 minute readTurning the Tables: Defense Litigators Embrace Lawsuits, Alleging Fraud at Plaintiffs Shops
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250