Man Who Lost Leg After Being Hit by Rolling Van Settles for $1.3 Million
A Newark man was paid a $1.3 million presuit settlement on May 11 after a van that was improperly parked on the street ran over one of his legs, which eventually had to be amputated below the knee due to necrosis.
May 19, 2020 at 05:10 PM
4 minute read
A Newark man was paid a $1.3 million presuit settlement on May 11 after a van that was improperly parked on the street ran over one of his legs, which eventually had to be amputated below the knee due to necrosis.
Plaintiff Dyran Thomas was a 65-year-old retiree on disability for unrelated conditions when the motor vehicle accident occurred on Oct. 5, 2019, in Newark. There was no lawsuit filed by Thomas, and the matter was settled directly with the adjuster from GEICO last month without participation by defense counsel, according to Andrew Statmore and Lance Bitterman of Fredson Statmore Bitterman in Bloomfield, who represented Thomas.
Alejandro Rodriguez of Belleville was listed in the police report as the owner of the silver 2003 Ford van that struck Thomas. Rodriguez, who was insured by GEICO, had a $300,000 auto policy and a $1 million umbrella policy, and the entire policy limits were offered on April 29, leading to the settlement, according to Statmore. The funds were deposited on May 11, he said.
Based on the police report, Thomas was entering his vehicle, which was legally parked near 293 16th St. in Newark, when the silver van that was double-parked in front of a convenience store at the same location began rolling forward toward him.
The driver of the van, identified as Freddy Vaerio-Guzman of Newark, was employed by Rodriguez. Vaerio-Guzman had left the van to run inside the convenience store to purchase something, believing he had put the van in "park," based on the police report. But "when he came back outside, [Vaerio-Guzman] noticed the van he parked had struck a pedestrian," the report said.
The van ended up knocking Thomas to the ground after hitting him. The police report states "the victim stated that he was attempting to get into his vehicle when all of a sudden Vehicle #1 [the van] began to roll toward him, striking him to the ground and running over his left leg and side."
Thomas was taken to University Hospital in Newark, where he was diagnosed with multiple fractures, including a left humerus fracture and a left pilon fracture with a fibular fracture. He was then transferred to Hackensack University Medical Center for surgery. Thomas initially had open reduction internal fixation surgery of the left pilon and left humerus fracture on Oct. 15, 2019, and open reduction internal fixation surgery three days later for the left pilon and fibular fractures.
Thomas was then transferred to Forest Hill Rehabilitation Center in Newark. While recovering from surgery, Statmore said, Thomas' left leg injury was not healing properly and he developed an infection and necrosis of the underlying skin. Thomas underwent below-the-knee amputation at University Medical Center on Dec. 13, 2019. Thomas was later transferred to CareOne in Paramus, where the treating surgeon confirmed that the need for amputation was directly related to the initial crash injury to the left lower leg, according to Statmore.
"That surgeon wrote a letter confirming causality, which we presented to GEICO," Statmore said in a phone interview.
Thomas has since been fitted with a prosthesis for the amputated leg and is living at home in Newark. He is currently undergoing additional outpatient rehabilitation and pain management treatments, according to his attorneys.
"Mr. Thomas is severely hampered," Statmore said. "He got a prosthetic and is learning to use it. He is undergoing rehabilitation and pain management to learn to live with the prosthetic."
"We got the full insurance policy limits," added Statmore. "While the case had potentially more value, the client was satisfied with the amount. The possibility of recovery against the insured wasn't something the client wanted to pursue."
GEICO confirmed the settlement amount and payment date.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Approves $667K Settlement Against Independence Blue Cross for Unpaid, Pre-Shift Computer Work
4 minute readTurning the Tables: Defense Litigators Embrace Lawsuits, Alleging Fraud at Plaintiffs Shops
6 minute readTitle Insurance Agency on Hot Seat Over Homebuyer Fees, Alleged Kickbacks
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Commission Confirms Three of Newsom's Appellate Court Picks
- 2Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
- 3GEICO, Travelers to Pay NY $11.3M for Cybersecurity Breaches
- 4'Professional Misconduct': Maryland Supreme Court Disbars 86-Year-Old Attorney
- 5Capital Markets Partners Expect IPO Resurgence During Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250