Motorist Who Struck Guardrail on I-80 Ramp to Recover $3.55 Million in Passaic Suit
A woman injured when she struck a protruding guardrail on an Interstate 80 access ramp in Paterson settled her Passaic County suit, Garris v. City…
May 21, 2020 at 09:00 AM
3 minute read
A woman injured when she struck a protruding guardrail on an Interstate 80 access ramp in Paterson settled her Passaic County suit, Garris v. City of Paterson, on May 4 for $3.55 million.
On the evening of June 17, 2017, Judith Garris, 58, was driving near the intersection of Beckwith Avenue and Lewis Street in Paterson, turning onto an on ramp to I-80, when she struck the guardrail with the right side of her car. She sustained spinal, shoulder and knee injuries, and was hospitalized, later undergoing two-level fusion procedures at the cervical and lumbar level, according to her lawyer, Edward Capozzi of Brach Eichler in Roseland.
The guardrail was apparently damaged from a prior accident and protruded into the roadway. The suit originally named the state, county and city before it was learned that it was the city that was responsible for the stretch of road on which the accident occurred, Capozzi noted. Garris contended that a nearby resident had repeatedly notified government authorities of the dangerous guardrail, but the issue was not addressed, he said.
Initial court filings from the city contended that Garris' own negligence was the cause of the accident. During expert discovery, though, the defendants didn't strongly contest liability or the injuries, said Capozzi, who handled the case along with Corey Dietz of the same firm.
Garris still has issues with mobility and is likely to require further surgery, Capozzi said.
According to court documents, the defendants made an offer of judgment in the amount of $2.15 million earlier this year. That offer was rejected, Capozzi noted.
The parties went through mediation sessions with Raymond Reddin of Hall Booth Smith's Saddle Brook office, a retired Superior Court judge, and settled during a phone session on May 4. The trial date had been postponed to September because of COVID-19 court closures, Capozzi said.
In the settlement, the city agreed to pay $545,000 directly, and its excess carrier, Lloyd's of London, agreed to pay $3,005,000, according to Capozzi.
Jonathan Marotta of Sciro & Marotta in Paterson, who represented the city, didn't respond to a request for comment. Neither did Shanna Torgerson of Gallo Vitucci Klar in Hackensack, the excess carrier's appointed defense counsel. A Paterson city spokeswoman didn't respond to emails seeking information.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAmid Growing Litigation Volume, Don't Expect UnitedHealthcare to Change Its Stripes After CEO's Killing
6 minute readJudge Approves $667K Settlement Against Independence Blue Cross for Unpaid, Pre-Shift Computer Work
4 minute readTurning the Tables: Defense Litigators Embrace Lawsuits, Alleging Fraud at Plaintiffs Shops
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250