Complications From Child's Surgery Lead to $12.5M Settlement in Essex
An Essex County Superior Court judge has approved a $12.5 million settlement in Ocasio v. Yeh, a medical malpractice suit on behalf of a child whose…
May 29, 2020 at 09:00 AM
7 minute read
An Essex County Superior Court judge has approved a $12.5 million settlement in Ocasio v. Yeh, a medical malpractice suit on behalf of a child whose right leg had to be amputated due to complications from a tonsillectomy.
Presiding Civil Judge Thomas Moore approved the settlement March 11 on behalf of the injured child, known as N.O., now 10.
The suit claims that N.O., who was five when he was hospitalized for removal of his tonsils and adenoids, had to have his right leg amputated because doctors and nurses failed to promptly diagnose and treat a case of acute compartment syndrome, in which blood clots cut off the blood supply to a limb.
N.O. and his parents were represented by David Mazie and Beth Baldinger of Mazie Slater Katz & Freeman in Roseland.
N.O. was admitted to St. Barnabas Medical Center in Livingston on April 27, 2015. During surgery, the child experienced complications that required emergent resuscitative measures, including making multiple punctures in both femoral arteries in an attempt to establish an arterial line, according to court documents. After surgery he was placed on a ventilator, sedated and moved to a pediatric intensive care unit at 9 a.m. There, he came under the care of defendants Timothy Yeh, a physician, and Karendeep Kandola, a registered nurse. Later, N.O. was placed under the care of physician Phoung Nghi and registered nurse Jennifer Aranda.
According to the suit, the doctors and nurses knew that the punctures that were made to N.O.'s femoral arteries presented a risk that blood clots could develop and hamper circulation. Accordingly, the nurses were instructed to monitor N.O.'s circulation every hour, according to court papers. At 2 p.m., Aranda called Yeh because she detected a decrease in pulse in N.O.'s lower extremities, and his right leg was cooler than the left. At 4 p.m., Aranda noticed another decrease in lower extremity pulse but failed to notify the physician on duty, according to court papers. Over the next 12 hours, the nurses saw no improvement in the child's circulation, but failed to notify Yeh or Nghi, the suit claimed.
N.O.'s parents, who were at their son's side, noticed that his feet and legs were unusually cool and that the right was cooler than the left, with a bluish discoloration, like a bruise, on the top of the foot, according to court papers. The boy's mother, Amanda Ocasio, brought the cold right foot and discoloration to the attention of doctors and nurses, but they dismissed her concerns, the plaintiffs claimed.
That evening, N.O., who was heavily sedated, began waking up, crying and indicating he felt pain in his right leg. The boy's mother reported that development to Aranda, who gave him morphine without telling Nghi. At 11 p.m., Aranda called in Nghi to report that N.O. was agitated and pulling out his breathing tube. Ocasio told the doctor she was concerned that his right foot was now even colder and the discoloration had grown darker and larger. Nghi responded that there was no reason to be concerned, according to a court document.
At 2 a.m., there was no detectable pulse in his lower right leg. At 7 a.m., N.O. underwent emergency surgery, but the vascular surgeon later told Ocasio and her husband, Richard, that the surgery came too late, and N.O. would likely lose his right leg.
The following day, N.O. was taken by helicopter to Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, where the family had to wait several weeks for gangrene to stop spreading before the amputation could be performed, according to court papers. On June 4, 2015, doctors amputated the right leg and his great left toe. On June 11, N.O. underwent more surgery for skin grafts and wound closure. He was released on July 17 of that year.
According to the suit, the defendant doctors and nurses failed to recognize the signs of acute compartment syndrome, where the risk of loss of limb increases as time passes without treatment, the suit said. N.O. experienced ACS for 12 hours before it was detected, according to court documents.
Since the amputation, N.O. uses a prosthesis and sometimes requires a wheelchair when use of the prosthetic causes irritations and wounds, court documents said. A child psychiatrist has diagnosed N.O. with post-traumatic stress disorder and separation anxiety, which the family claims has impacted his social and educational functioning. The child's parents filed a medical malpractice suit against physicians Yeh and Nghi, nurses Kandola and Aranda, and St. Barnabas Medical Center.
The defendants maintained that there were no signs of acute compartment syndrome, and that they acted swiftly in response to changes in the patient's condition, according to Mazie.
The settlement was reached in January, following mediation with Dennis Carey III, a retired Superior Court judge with Tompkins, McGuire, Wachenfeld & Barry in Roseland, and involvement by Moore, said Mazie.
The settlement provides $10 million to N.O., $1.5 million for the Portee claim by Amanda Ocasio and $1 million for the Portee claim by Richard Ocasio.
Mazie Slater was awarded $380,380 in expenses plus 25% of the net recovery in excess of $3 million. Lexington Insurance paid $7 million on behalf St. Barnabas, both doctors and both nurses; Continental Casualty, doing business as AIG, paid $5 million on behalf of St. Barnabas, both doctors and both nurses; and CNA Insurance paid $500,000 on behalf of Kandola. The defendants made payment in late April, according to Mazie.
Joseph Garrubbo of Garrubbo & Capece in Union represented Yeh, along with Douglas Ammerman of Hall Booth Smith in Atlanta.
Julia Klubenspies of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin in Roseland represented St. Barnabas and Kandola.
Lauren Strollo of Vasios, Kelly & Strollo in Union represented Nghi, and Lauren O'Neill of MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles in Cedar Knolls represented Aranda.
The defense lawyers did not respond to requests for comment about the case.
— Charles Toutant
|$500K in Monmouth Slip and Fall
Ansell v. PNC Bank: A man who slipped on ice and fell outside of a PNC Bank branch in Red Bank has settled his Monmouth County lawsuit with the bank and snow and ice removal company for $500,000, the law firm representing him said.
Plaintiff Stephen Ansell reached a settlement with the defendants during a pretrial conference with assistance from a mediator, according to a statement released by Ansell's counsel, Michael Hanus of Middletown firm Hanus & Parsons.
Thomas Coffey of Donnelly Minter & Kelley represented DeFazio Landscaping, and Patrick Coyne of Terkowitz & Hermesmann represented PNC. Neither responded to requests for comment.
According to Hanus & Parsons, Ansell, then 53, was walking to the train and slipped on a patch of ice walking down the sidewalk along Reckless Place in Red bank in front of a PNC branch on Feb. 2, 2016.
A week prior, there had been 18 inches of snowfall, and the parking lot of the PNC was filled with snow piles from plowing, the firm said. Temperatures varied throughout the week, causing snow to melt and water to freeze subsequently when the temperature fell again.
Ansell alleged that there was no salt or ice melting agents on the sidewalk at the time of his fall, also claiming that the defendants knew or should have known of the dangerous conditions present.
Ansell sustained fractures in his left lower leg and ankle, and required surgery. Screws were surgically inserted, but two later had to be removed. Ansell underwent physical therapy afterward, according to the lawyers.
The firm said Ansell worked in the IT field and suffered lost wages as a result of his injury. He also incurred $53,000 in medical bills, paid by insurance, for which a lien was asserted, the firm said.
The firm added that the plaintiff, who is a father of two, was a cycling and soccer enthusiast, but can no longer participate in those activities.
The case was presided over by Monmouth County Superior Court Judge Owen McCarthy. The county mediator was Marie Accardi.
— P.J. D'Annunzio
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Approves $667K Settlement Against Independence Blue Cross for Unpaid, Pre-Shift Computer Work
4 minute readTurning the Tables: Defense Litigators Embrace Lawsuits, Alleging Fraud at Plaintiffs Shops
6 minute readTitle Insurance Agency on Hot Seat Over Homebuyer Fees, Alleged Kickbacks
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1O'Melveny, Bracewell Add Lawyers to Texas Energy Teams
- 2Who Got the Work: 16 Lawyers Appointed to BioLab Class Action Litigation
- 3White & Case Settles Wrongful Conviction Lawsuit With City Agreeing to Pay $9.45 Million
- 43 New Judges: Here's Who Kemp Just Appointed to the Bench
- 5Apple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250