A Silver Lining for Family Lawyers and Clients in These Uncertain Times
Because these virtual innovations benefit the judges, the attorneys and the litigants, in terms of efficiency and lower costs, I believe that these innovations will become part of our regular court practice.
June 05, 2020 at 12:00 PM
4 minute read
The paradigm of practicing family law has changed dramatically since practitioners have been presented with the concerns of social distancing as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Those concerns have resulted in innovations that benefit judges, attorneys and particularly clients in terms of efficiency and lower costs.
When the pandemic began, court appearances for trials, in-court case management and settlement conferences were adjourned without date, creating delays for litigants and concern among practitioners. No new dates were being scheduled by the court. Arbitrations were adjourned, without date. Mediations that had been ongoing were also adjourned due to the need for social distancing, rather than meeting in a law office conference room to resolve all issues. Family law practitioners who had relied upon in-person, face to face communications in court and with clients had to meet the challenge of advocating for their clients in the context of a "new normal."
Challenges are always met with innovation and creativity, and the challenges facing family law practitioners have been no exception. Gradually, in addition to being closed to the public, the courthouses were closed to judges and courthouse staff, necessitating conducting court business remotely. At first, a judge would simply conduct a conference by way of telephone. Involvement of two attorneys, two clients and the judge in a telephone conference call had always been problematic, however. The judge had difficulty controlling when an attorney was arguing and how long that attorney was permitted to speak; it was difficult if not impossible for the judge to interject and to be heard.
The judges then began scheduling Zoom conferences and motion oral argument: virtual court appearances. In doing so, a judge is able to maintain a regular schedule for appearances and hear and decide motions on a timely basis, without adjournment. Most impressive, however, has been the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of a virtual court appearance, for the attorneys and the clients. Travel to the courthouse and parking is eliminated. Waiting in the courthouse for the judge to be available is eliminated. Oral argument is generally heard when scheduled. A judge is free of the distractions that he or she might experience in a courtroom, delaying the proceeding. The general time frame for the appearance is established in advance. The parties appear and are sworn in, participating in the entire proceeding, in their homes. Attorneys argue on behalf of their clients as they would in a courtroom, with the added advantage of being able to clearly view each speaker. A Zoom family law trial or plenary hearing with the direct and cross-examination of witnesses, the introduction of documentary evidence and impeachment creates unique challenges for the judge and the attorneys. Those challenges, however, will be overcome.
Virtual mediation is also an innovation that is a cost-effective and productive way of resolving family law disputes. Sessions can be conducted at the convenience of the parties, early or late, to meet any child care concerns. Mediation is conducted when scheduled, with the mediator conducting the session and counsel and the parties participating in-person, at home, as they would in a law office conference room. If an attorney and his or her client wish to confer privately, out of the presence of the other participants, they can simply leave the Zoom session and rejoin utilizing the same identification number and password. The session then continues until the parties have arrived at a resolution of all issues. The mediator then prepares the customary Memorandum of Understanding, to be discussed and converted to a Marital Settlement Agreement.
Because these virtual innovations benefit the judges, the attorneys and the clients in terms of efficiency and lower costs, I believe, thankfully, that these innovations will become part of our regular court practice. As a mediator, I will continue to utilize virtual mediation as I have done for the past weeks with positive feedback from all participants.
Deborah E. Nelson is a Member of the Family Law Group at Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi in West Orange.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All$113K Sanction Award to Law Firm at Stake: NJ Supreme Court Will Consider 'Unsettled Law' Frivolous Litigation Question
4 minute readWhich Outside Law Firms Are Irreplaceable, and Which Should Have Gotten the Ax Years Ago?
4 minute readLargest Law Firms: New Jersey and Firmwide Attorney Count
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250