Google's May Core Update: What Every Law Firm Needs to Know
Google's consistent focus on quality and relevant content is changing the search landscape for all industries.
June 05, 2020 at 10:00 AM
5 minute read
Google did it again, another core update in the books. As of May 18, the Google Search Liaison tweeted that Google's Core Update was complete. This 14-day update showed a rather large impact on search results which led to firms seeing a change in both their impressions and clicks to their websites from Google. The specifics around this core update, like the majority of every update before it, are largely unknown, but SEO's have begun to piece together patterns and trends observed over weeks following the beginning of the update roll-out to make a few key inferences regarding its wide impact on search results.
|What Is a 'Core Update'
Google makes thousands of changes to their algorithm each year which equates to an average of multiple a day. Google is very secretive about the changes they make and the frequency by which they make them. Core updates are large scale rollouts of changes to the way the algorithm works. Google will release a core update every few months, the last of which being in January 2020. These updates typically "shake things up" in the search rankings, allowing Google to rectify any issues with the content that is being displayed and for them to further push their quality scoring and ranking factors to be as optimal for searchers as possible. Core updates are nothing to be alarmed by, unless you don't have an SEO keeping their finger on the pulse and guiding your website strategy to abide by Google best practices.
|The Update's Impact on Lawyers
May's update did not discriminate, there wasn't just one "loser" when it came to the aforementioned "shake up." It is already clear that this update definitely looked at content length and quality (more information can be found on Google's Webmaster Central Blog) and most shifts weren't small. Google has been pushing the "quality content is king" mantra for years and is not backing down anytime soon. Law firms and lawyer SEO has become a lot more important with each update as Google's content guidelines lend themselves nicely to what attorneys do.
Long form content is crucial to following Google's best practices, which is perfect for law firms. Being that legal articles are more on the technical side, longer content allows the firm to answer several questions and provide useful information without appearing to be a know-it-all or a novel writer. Searchers are used to scrolling several times to read an article (many more on their mobile devices) and prefer to get their information from one location. Attorneys can write to their heart's content without fear of boring their reader or the infamous "no one will read something that long" logic we hear at 9Sail on a weekly basis from our law firm SEO clients.
|How to Write Blogs/Articles to Follow Google's Best Practices
Writing articles, blogs, and static content pages is a bit of an art form, one that is rather easy to be great at, with a little practice. Content writing is more about the preparation and research than it is about the execution. Bryan Pattman, Lead Digital Strategist at 9Sail said:
There should be at least 15 minutes of research time before you actually begin writing any content for your website. The main goal of search engines is to show users the best result on the first try and if you do not know what the top results for your target search terms look like, you are going to have a hard time writing content that is informative enough to rank well. You should be taking the best H2 subheadings from each page to make sure that you are covering all of the topics that a searcher could be looking for and then add even more subheadings to show your expertise on the topic.
If you consistently create content that includes the best subheadings of the top 10 search results (also known as the "skyscraper method") along with other subheadings about the topic you will have a greater chance of ranking on the first page for the search terms that you are targeting.
Cast a net wide enough to speak to a group of users from professionals to a layman gathering information. "Targeting a wider audience, increases both traffic and leads, in my experience." said Domenic Romano, Managing Partner of Romano Law, a rapidly growing law firm that works with both businesses as well as individuals in entertainment and corporate industries. "Being accessible and humble while de-mystifying the law and leading with curiosity can make a big difference."
|Resources for Lawyers to Use When Writing Content
There are many great resources around the internet for people who are either trying to optimize their own websites or for people looking to get educated on the latest trends and best practices. Here are just a few resources we recommend you checkout:
- EAT – Learn about E-A-T and why it is important. Google's Webmaster Central Blog references E-A-T (Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness) and simply cannot be ignored.
- Content Guide – When writing content, there is a formula to follow in-order to produce a high quality piece. We recommend our clients follow this guide when having an attorney or marketing person within a law firm write content for their website.
- Skyscraper Technique – This technique will help writers to assess what they should cover in their article to gain a favorable position on Google.
Joe Giovannoli is Founder & CEO of 9Sail, a search marketing company that caters to the legal industry.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAppellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
4 minute readChiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
5 minute read'A Mockery' of Deposition Rules: Walgreens Wins Sanctions Dispute Over Corporate Witness Allegedly Unfamiliar With Company
$113K Sanction Award to Law Firm at Stake: NJ Supreme Court Will Consider 'Unsettled Law' Frivolous Litigation Question
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Cars Reach Record Fuel Economy but Largely Fail to Meet Biden's EPA Standard, Agency Says
- 2How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 3DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 4GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 5Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250