Motorcyclist Injured in Crash Paid $1.7 Million in Morris County Suit
A Morris County civil case over a 2017 accident in Hackensack, involving a man who was seriously injured when his motorcycle was struck by a turning…
June 10, 2020 at 09:00 AM
5 minute read
A Morris County civil case over a 2017 accident in Hackensack, involving a man who was seriously injured when his motorcycle was struck by a turning vehicle, settled for $1.7 million on May 18. Allstate covered the entire settlement, which was paid on June 1.
The accident occurred on June 14, 2017, when plaintiff Matthew Priessnitz, then 29 and an auto mechanic from Asbury, was traveling south on a 2015 white Suzuki DR-Z400 motorcycle along Route 182-Mountain Avenue and Shelley Drive in Hackensack, according to a police report.
Based on the police report, defendant Elizabeth Roe, then 19, of Long Valley, was pulling out of a parking lot in a grey 2013 Honda Odyssey at 254 Route 182 Mountain Ave., and attempted to make a left turn onto Route 182 and cut off Priessnitz, causing the collision.
Priessnitz's motorcycle struck Roe's vehicle on the driver's side fender, according to the police report.
Priessnitz, represented by Jeffrey Zenna of Blume Forte Fried Zerres and Molinari in Chatham, filed a complaint on May 31, 2018.
The police report states Priessnitz suffered serious injuries and was transported to Morristown Medical Center for a left femoral fracture following the accident.
Zenna said he underwent two open reduction internal fixation surgeries and had a bone graft procedure.
"$1.7 million was a fair settlement given the severity of his injuries and his age," Zenna said in a phone call. "He has recovered but still has some weakness in the leg."
Zenna said the funds were deposited on June 1.
Roe was represented by Steven Litvak of Litvak & Trifolis in Cedar Knolls. Litvak and a representative at Allstate confirmed the $1.7 million amount. Litvak had no further comment.
Priessnitz, while recovering, has not returned to full-time work and is no longer a mechanic, Zenna noted.
Priessnitz "did not return to his job but rather studied to become a public adjuster," added Zenna. "He is presently doing odd jobs and looking for work as a public adjuster."
— Suzette Parmley
|Teacher Sex Assault Case Settles for $980K
T.T. v. Strand: A civil case over a teacher's sexual assault of an eighth grade student settled for $980,000 in Sussex County on Feb. 15.
According to counsel for the plaintiff and some defendants, in June 2016, the plaintiff, then 14 and an eighth-grade student at the Hopatcong Middle School, was sexually assaulted by her teacher, Eric Strand. (In 2017, Strand, then 57, pleaded guilty to second- and third-degree charges, and was sentenced to three years behind bars, according to reports.)
Strand's interaction with the student had begun months earlier, with the exchange of sexually explicit text messages and emails. This led to instances of kissing and groping during school hours and, in one instance, at Strand's home. After the assault, Strand was arrested. The plaintiff, referred to as T.T., claimed that, when her interaction with Strand became public, she was harassed by her peers.
The girl's parents sued the Borough of Hopatcong Board of Education, school principal Emil Binotto, and a Hopatcong high school principal, Lewis Benfatti. The lawsuit, filed in Sussex County Superior Court, alleged negligent supervision and violation of the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination. The suit claimed the defendants failed to protect the plaintiff when they were well aware of Strand's past indecent behavior with students. Counsel also maintained that the school allowed the creation of a sexually hostile education environment. In his report, the plaintiff's expert in computer software opined that Hopatcong could have installed software in its computer system that would have flagged the inappropriate emails between Strand and the plaintiff.
According to the defense, in May 2016, Strand began communicating with the plaintiff via his school email account and via texts through his personal phone. The messages were not sexual and involved school-related functions and trips, the defense asserted. Strand and the plaintiff kissed and touched several times around June 2016. The defense asserted that, following Strand's arrest, the board of education promptly investigated the allegations, demonstrating that out of the nearly dozen board employees interviewed, none had any knowledge of inappropriate sexual activity by Strand toward the plaintiff or toward any other female student. Strand was immediately suspended and ultimately terminated, the defense contended. The defense maintained that the board took reasonable steps to supervise, counsel and protect the plaintiff from any retaliation and harassment from peers. According to the defense, the plaintiff rejected the board's offer to pay for her to attend an out-of-district school. The defense's educational expert opined that the board was not negligent in its retention and supervision of Strand.
The suit claimed the plaintiff experienced post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety and depression. She came under the care of a mental health counselor, with whom she treated throughout her high school tenure. The plaintiff was later able to graduate from high school near the top of her class. The defense contended that T.T. has preexisting anxiety.
The parties negotiated a pretrial settlement. Strand, uninsured, agreed to pay $30,000. The board of education's insurer, the School Alliance Insurance Fund, agreed to pay $950,000 on behalf of Binotto and Benfatti.
Nicholas F. Pompelio and Paul R. Rizzo of DiFrancesco, Bateman, Kunzman, Davis, Lehrer & Flaum represented the plaintiffs.
Jeffrey L. Shanaberger of Hill Wallack represented the Borough of Hopatcong Board of Education and Benfatti. Eric L. Harrison of Methfessel & Werbel represented Binotto. Douglas S. Brierley of Brierley & Humick represented Strand.
*Editor's Comment: This report is based on information that was provided by counsel for plaintiffs, the board of education, Binotto and Benfatti. Counsel for Strand did not respond to phone calls.
— Aaron Jenkins (adapted from VerdictSearch reports)
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Approves $667K Settlement Against Independence Blue Cross for Unpaid, Pre-Shift Computer Work
4 minute readTurning the Tables: Defense Litigators Embrace Lawsuits, Alleging Fraud at Plaintiffs Shops
6 minute readTitle Insurance Agency on Hot Seat Over Homebuyer Fees, Alleged Kickbacks
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Democrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal with GOP
- 2Trump Taps Former Fla. Attorney General for AG
- 3Newsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
- 4Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
- 5UN Treaty Enacting Cybercrime Standards Likely to Face Headwinds in US, Other Countries
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250