BAR REPORT - Capitol Report
NJ Legislature contemplates post-closure bills
June 15, 2020 at 12:00 PM
4 minute read
As New Jersey reopens, Legislature contemplates post-closure bills
Last week, Governor Phil Murphy lifted the shelter-in-place order, effective June 9, which restricted travel and shut down businesses throughout the state. He also loosened the restrictions on indoor and outdoor gatherings, increasing the allowable numbers for such events.
But many questions still remain as to what impact his most recent Executive Orders 152 and 153 will have on New Jersey's Road Back Plan, which provides for a "methodical and strategic reopening of businesses and activities." Among other things, the orders increase the allowable number of individuals at indoor gatherings to 50 and outdoor gatherings to 100. They also allow for the reopening of outdoor spaces at recreational and entertainment businesses, provided they adopt policies encompassing, among other things, mandated infection control practices, frequent breaks for employees for hand washing, occupancy limits in restrooms, and worker notifications of COVID-19 exposures.
In the Judiciary, the Supreme Court approved a plan that transitions from fully remote operations to the gradual return to courthouses and court facilities.
The New Jersey Court's Post-Pandemic Plan contains a two-phased plan that outlines precautions being implemented before buildings will open for in-person meetings. Phase 2 of the plan is anticipated to list court events that will continue to be conducted remotely and those that will resume in person. The plan can be found attached to the Notice to the Bar dated June 10, on the Judiciary's website, at njcourts.gov.
In the Legislature, plans have not yet been set out to reopen the State House; however, virtual committee meetings were held to receive testimony on key COVID-19 bills.
A-4170 (Zwicker)/S-2539 (Greenstein) restricts use of certain data collected for the purposes of contact tracing related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
The Assembly Community Development and Affairs and Assembly Science, Innovation and Technology committees held a joint hearing to receive testimony from invited guests concerning the contact tracing bill. Questions explored included how to receive the data and storage and privacy issues related to data collection.
The legislation mandates that any contact tracing during the COVID-19 pandemic can only be used for that specific purpose, and that data must be deleted 30 days after it is received. It would also require the same level of protection for contact tracing data shared by public health entities with a third party. The commissioner of health would also be required to publish guidance online regarding how collected data may be used and how its security and confidentiality must be ensured.
A-3998 (Benson)/S-2476 (Singleton) focuses on workers' compensation supplemental benefits.
The Senate Budget and Appropriations Committee considered the bill, which provides supplemental benefit payments to the dependents of essential employees who died in the course of employment as a result of COVID-19.
The bill provides a cost-of-living adjustment to the spouse or dependent's workers' compensation death benefit if the employee dies from the coronavirus. Under the bill, an essential employee is defined as an employee in the public or private sector who, during a state of emergency, is a public safety worker or first responder; is involved in providing medical and other healthcare services, emergency transportation, social services, and other care services; performs functions that involve physical proximity to members of the public and are essential to the public's health, safety and welfare; or is deemed an essential employee by the public authority declaring the state of emergency. The bill was voted out of committee and heads to the Senate for a vote this week.
Both bills are being monitored by the New Jersey State Bar Association.
This is a status report provided by the New Jersey State Bar Association on recently passed and pending legislation, regulations, gubernatorial nominations and/or appointments of interest to lawyers, as well as the involvement of the NJSBA as amicus in appellate court matters. To learn more, visit njsba.com.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNJ Attorney General's Office Announces Major Shake-Up for Executive Leadership Team
4 minute read'Bewitched by the Technology': $300K to Settle Faulty Facial Recognition
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Cars Reach Record Fuel Economy but Largely Fail to Meet Biden's EPA Standard, Agency Says
- 2How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 3DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 4GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 5Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250