State Judiciary Enters Phase 2 of Reopening
Gov. Phil Murphy also announced that Atlantic City's nine casinos will be allowed to open July 2 at 25% capacity after being shuttered since mid-March. The reopening will come in time for what is traditionally one of the busiest weekends at the Jersey Shore: July 4 weekend.
June 22, 2020 at 07:16 PM
4 minute read
On the same day that Gov. Phil Murphy relaxed lockdown restrictions on casinos, indoor dining and large gatherings, the New Jersey Judiciary moved to its next phase of resuming court functions and allowing staff to return.
On Monday, Phase 2 of the Judiciary's Post-Pandemic Plan, which allows for 10% to 15% of judges and staff to return to court facilities and certain matters that cannot proceed remotely to be conducted onsite, kicked in.
The percentage is up from 5% in Phase 1, which began March 18.
Other than judges and staff, only attorneys and those members of the public who have scheduled court matters or appointments are permitted in the buildings during Phase 2, according to a release Monday from Chief Justice Stuart Rabner, the main architect of the courts' post-pandemic plan.
Those who have scheduled court matters or an appointment must wear a mask in the building and must maintain six feet of distance from others wherever possible, Rabner said.
Those who are sick or believe they have the COVID-19 virus should not enter any court facilities, while members of the public seeking court services should contact the court by phone or email without entering the building.
Self-represented litigants can continue to receive services remotely by contacting the ombudsman's office in their vicinage, according to the same release.
Since March 16 the judiciary has conducted several thousand court hearings, settlement proceedings and detention hearings, arraignments and municipal appeals, among other events, remotely because of COVID-19. The "Post-Pandemic Plan – Transition from Phase 1 to Phase 2," was announced June 10 as a blueprint on returning to New Jersey courts. It was released concurrently with an order from the court requiring the use of "face masks or other face coverings" in courtrooms and common areas.
Phase 2 is generally described in the plan as: "Gradual and Limited Return," following Phase 1, which ran from March 18 to June 21 and allowed less than 5% of judges and staff onsite, while buildings remain closed to attorneys and the public.
"Phase 3: New Operations" covers ongoing remote operations, with a gradual increase of onsite events, and eventually including new jury trials; and allowing 50% to 75% of judges and staff onsite (with staggered schedules).
"Phase 4: Ongoing Model" will begin once a vaccine is available and/or herd immunity is established, according to the plan. In this period, up to 75% to 80% of judges and staff will be allowed onsite.
Meanwhile, as COVID-19′s infection rate continues to decline, Murphy announced that Atlantic City's nine casinos will be allowed to open July 2 at 25% capacity after being shuttered since mid-March in time for what is traditionally one of the busiest weekends at the Shore, the Fourth of July weekend.
The 25% capacity rule also applies to restaurants, which can begin to offer indoor dining on the same date, according to the governor.
Murphy also increased indoor and outdoor gathering capacity limits.
Effective immediately, indoor gatherings are now limited to 25% capacity of the rooms in which they will take place, with a maximum of 100 persons, according to a release from the Governor's Office on Monday.
Outdoor gatherings are now limited to 250 persons, and outdoor religious services and political activities will continue to have no numerical limits.
"While we are still in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, the commonsense public health measures that New Jerseyans have been complying with are now allowing for us to expand capacity limits," Murphy said in a statement. "We will continue to evaluate and make reopening decisions based on data, science and facts."
The state's racetracks can also start taking bets July 2.
The announcements came on the same day that the state's pools, hair salons, barbers and other personal grooming facilities got the green light to open.
As of Monday, the novel coronavirus had claimed 12, 895 lives in New Jersey, while the caseload was now at 169,415 positive cases.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRetiring AOC Director Judge Glenn A. Grant Walks Away From Judiciary 'Tremendously Impressed' by New Jersey's Judges
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Loopholes, DNA Collection and Tech: Does Your Consent as a User of a Genealogy Website Override Another Person’s Fourth Amendment Right?
- 2Free Microsoft Browser Extension Is Costing Content Creators, Class Action Claims
- 3Reshaping IP Policy Under the Second Trump Administration
- 4Lawyers' Reenactment Footage Leads to $1.5M Settlement
- 5People in the News—Feb. 4, 2025—McGuireWoods, Barley Snyder
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250