How NJ Firms Ranked on the NLJ 500
Of the 19 New Jersey firms included, 12 had year-over-year increases in attorney head count.
June 24, 2020 at 10:53 AM
4 minute read
As is the case every year, New Jersey firms making the recently released NLJ 500, which measures year-to-year attorney head counts for U.S.-based law firms, saw a wide array of changes.
New Jersey homegrown firms—as well as firms such as Day Pitney and Peckar & Abramson, with their largest offices in New Jersey—number 19 on the list, which is released every year by the National Law Journal. The head count numbers are based on the prior calendar year.
Of the 19 New Jersey firms, 12 had year-over-year increases in attorney head count. Of the remaining seven, six saw decreases, and one had the exact same attorney head count for 2019 and 2018.
The combined number of lawyers at the NLJ 500 firms increased 2.5% in 2019, which is a similar rate to the prior year. It's worth noting that some firms that increased their head count didn't necessarily gain ground in the rankings if their growth rate was behind other firms.
For New Jersey, nine of the 19 firms on the NLJ 500 climbed the list.
The NLJ ranks the 350 largest firms, and groups the other 150 into two "tiers." ALM Legal Intelligence, however, collects specific head count data for all 500 firms (and more), and each firm's specific ranking, regardless of whether it was inside or outside the top 350, is included here.
Here's how the 19 New Jersey firms stacked up.
• McCarter & English's attorney head count decreased 3.8%, to 359, and the firm moved back nine spots in the rankings, to No. 123.
• Lowenstein Sandler increased its attorney head count by 7%, to 307, and climbed five spots, to No. 140.
• Day Pitney saw a 5.7% increase in attorney head count, to 268, and moved up three spots, to No. 164.
• McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter saw a 7.6% drop in attorney head count, to 232, and slid 13 spots, to No. 184.
• Archer & Greiner's head count decreased by 1.7%, to 177, and the firm moved back 10 spots, to No. 230.
• Gibbons grew its head count 1.3%, to 173. But it moved back in the rankings four spots, to No. 237.
• Connell Foley's net gain of one attorney in 2019 works out to a 0.7% increase, to 137 total attorneys. The firm meanwhile slipped four spots, to No. 277.
• Cole Schotz saw its head count increase 2.1%, to 144, and moved up four spots, to No. 281.
• Bressler, Amery & Ross was listed with a large population increase from 2018 to 2019, but this year is listed with a significant decrease. Attorney head count decreased 20.6%, to 142. It moved back 65 spots in the rankings, to No 288.
• Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi's head count increased 4.4%, to 141, and it moved up 14 spots, to No. 290.
• Sills Cummis & Gross had a net increase of one attorney (a 0.7% increase, to 137), and climbed one spot, to No. 300.
• Riker Danzig Scherer Hyland & Perretti saw a 5.3% decrease, to 128 lawyers, and slid 19 spots in the rankings, to No. 325.
• Norris McLaughlin's attorney head count (122) was flat year-to-year. The firm moved down four spots, to No. 335.
• Peckar & Abramson had a 5.3% head count increase, to 120, and climbed eight spots, to No. 342.
• Wilentz Goldman & Spitzer saw a 15.1% head count increase, to 107, and moved up 44 spots, to No. 370.
• Stark & Stark had a 1% increase, to 99 attorneys, but moved back six spots, to No. 394.
• Porzio Bromberg & Newman grew its head count 13.1%, to 95, and climbed 43 spots, to No. 421.
• Capehart Scatchard saw a 7.4% head count decrease, to 87, and moved back 40 spots, to No. 446.
• Greenbaum Rowe Smith & Davis had a 3.6% increase, to 86 lawyers, and climbed eight spots, to No. 459.
• Schenck Price Smith & King's head count increased 5.2%, to 81, and it moved up nine spots, to No. 484.
Last year there were 20 New Jersey firms listed. This year, Hoagland Longo Moran Dunst & Doukas didn't make the list. The New Brunswick-based firm had an attorney head count of 70 in 2019, according to ALM Legal Intelligence. The No. 500 firm on this year's NLJ 500, Cohen & Gresser of New York, is listed with 78 attorneys.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAppellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
4 minute readChiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
5 minute read'A Mockery' of Deposition Rules: Walgreens Wins Sanctions Dispute Over Corporate Witness Allegedly Unfamiliar With Company
Law Firms Mentioned
- Norris McLaughlin
- Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer
- Bressler Amery Ross
- Sills Cummis & Gross
- Archer & Greiner P.C.
- Cole, Schotz, Meisel, Forman & Leonard
- Gibbons PC
- Day Pitney
- Lowenstein Sandler
- Capehart Scatchard
- Riker Danzig Scherer
- Stark & Stark
- Connell Foley
- McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP
- Cohen & Gresser LLP
- McCarter & English
- Porzio Bromberg Newman
- Peckar Abramson
- Greenbaum Rowe Smith
- Schenck Price Smith
- Hoagland, Longo, Moran, Dunst & Doukas, L.L.P.
Trending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250