BAR REPORT - Capitol Report
NJSBA cites confusion, lack of information and consistency, and interlock ignition issues
June 29, 2020 at 08:00 AM
3 minute read
NJSBA Seeks Resolution of Municipal Court Issues
In response to concerns expressed by practitioners, the New Jersey State Bar Association (NJSBA) reached out to state officials about municipal court issues. In a trio of letters, the organization asked for uniformity in plea-by-mail processes, information on expansion of a municipal court portal, a central repository for municipal prosecutor information and priority for ignition interlock services.
The NJSBA wrote to the New Jersey chief justice, governor and state attorney general with its concerns.
"The plea-by-mail process is confusing, inconsistently applied, does not effectively permit the disposal of many municipal court matters, and does not meet the notification requirements concerning potential immigration consequences," NJSBA President Kimberly A. Yonta wrote in a letter to Chief Justice Stuart Rabner asking for a uniform, interactive form that would be accepted in all municipal courts.
She also asked for additional information about an effort to expand the current municipal court public portal that allows people charged with certain offenses to pay tickets online. The NJSBA contends it has not been included in discussions about the plans for expansion of the portal, and practitioners have many questions, including whether attorneys will have access to it. Currently, defendants cannot use the online portal if they are represented by counsel.
One of the chief concerns about both plea-by-mail and expansion of the online portal is the potential consequences for certain immigrant defendants. The NJSBA urged that any plea-by-mail forms and the resolution of any municipal court matter include a reference to potential immigration consequences as a result of the action, and ensure there has been an opportunity for a defendant to explore those potential consequences.
Yonta noted the lack of a current roster of municipal prosecutors as another issue interfering with the resolution of municipal court cases. In a letter to Attorney General Gurbir S. Grewal asking for a central listing of prosecutors, Yonta wrote, "This has become an important, necessary resource for defendants, defense attorneys and other involved parties to address pending municipal court matters during the COVID-19 shutdown." She also suggested that, consistent with its oversight of municipal prosecutors, the Attorney General's Office should provide state email addresses through which municipal prosecutors can conduct municipal business separate from their private law firm business. This would have the added benefit of allowing future prosecutors to have all of the relevant background information about the current status of a pending matter.
Access to motor vehicle offices for defendants requiring interlock ignition systems was the subject of a letter from Yonta to Governor Phil Murphy. Acknowledging the opening of state offices in early June, Yonta asked that certain services be prioritized.
"The extended closure of MVC offices…has prevented individuals from getting 'chipped' and obtaining the requisite embossed license," she wrote, noting without those services, defendants are unable to drive, and the state does not gain the benefit of the safety assurances the interlock is meant to provide.
The full text of the letters can be viewed at njsba.com.
This is a status report provided by the New Jersey State Bar Association on recently passed and pending legislation, regulations, gubernatorial nominations and/or appointments of interest to lawyers, as well as the involvement of the NJSBA as amicus in appellate court matters. To learn more, visit njsba.com.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAppellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
4 minute readChiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
5 minute read'A Mockery' of Deposition Rules: Walgreens Wins Sanctions Dispute Over Corporate Witness Allegedly Unfamiliar With Company
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250