Lawyer Disbarred for Taking $91,749 From Client's Trust Account
The Disciplinary Review Board said MacLachlan used some of the money to pay for his daughter's horse riding lessons.
July 02, 2020 at 01:41 PM
3 minute read
Attorney Donald MacLachlan of Saddle River has been disbarred for taking $91,749 from a client's trust account for his own use, according to an order made public Thursday.
When MacLachlan took the funds, he knew they belonged to the client and that the client had not authorized him to use them, the court's Disciplinary Review Board said. MacLachlan was disbarred after failing to appear before disciplinary authorities to answer the charges.
MacLachlan came under investigation after Oradell attorney Robert Hitscherich submitted a claim to the Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection on behalf of the Irrevocable Trust of Guy A. Blehl. MacLachlan was placed on temporary suspension in October 2019 after making multiple, unexplained cash withdrawals from bank accounts associated with the Blehl trust.
MacLachlan had created the trust on behalf of Blehl, his client. Upon Blehl's death, MacLachlan collected $1 million in insurance proceeds and placed the money in three accounts, with 50% going to Blehl's widow, Sally, and 25% each to his son and daughter. Sally Blehl remained in regular contact with MacLachlan until she couldn't reach him in August 2017, according to the DRB.
In May 2018, the Bergen County Surrogate Court removed MacLachlan as trustee and replaced him with the dead man's brother, Allen Blehl, who obtained a forensic accounting audit of the trust. Among other things, the audit found that MacLachlan obtained seven certified checks from the trust account, totaling $24,335, payable to Willow Hill Farm, where MacLachlan's daughter received horseback riding lessons, the DRB said.
The court found MacLachlan should be disbarred for violating RPC 1.15(a), knowing misappropriation of client funds; RPC 1.15(b), failure to promptly disburse funds; RPC 8.4(b), commission of a criminal act that reflects adversely on a lawyer's honesty, truthfulness or fitness; and RPC 8.4 (c), conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation. The court also found MacLachlan's conduct met the conditions established by the state Supreme Court for disbarment following misappropriation in In re Wilson and In re Hollendonner.
In February 2018, the Department of Justice sued MacLachlan in U.S. district court to obtain judgments on more than $1.5 million in unpaid income and payroll taxes, and to foreclose on tax liens against his home.
The government's complaint in that case also seeks a determination of the interests of other parties named as defendants, including MacLachlan's wife, Marie Napoliello MacLachlan; the mortgage holder, Ocwen Loan Servicing; the New Jersey Division of Taxation; and the law firm of Riker Danzig Scherer Hyland & Perretti, which recorded a judgment against him in 2016.
Riker Danzig sued Donald MacLachlan and his firm in 2015, claiming it was owed more than $150,000 for work the firm performed after he sought its assistance with class action litigation he filed.
MacLachlan has not filed an answer in that case and no counsel has come forward to represent him. A motion to enter default judgment against him is pending.
MacLachlan could not be reached for comment. Messages were not being accepted at a telephone number listed in his name.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWas $1.3M in 'Incentive' Payments Commission? NJ Justices Weigh Arguments
3 minute readLaw Firms Look to Gen Z for AI Skills, as 'Data Becomes the Oil of Legal'
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Public Notices/Calendars
- 2Wednesday Newspaper
- 3Decision of the Day: Qui Tam Relators Do Not Plausibly Claim Firm Avoided Tax Obligations Through Visa Applications, Circuit Finds
- 4Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-116
- 5Big Law Firms Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250