Worker Injured in Electrical Accident Gets $1.2M Settlement in Essex
A worker severely injured by electrocution at a construction site was paid a $1.2 million settlement in his Essex County lawsuit, Zhindon v. Prestige…
July 02, 2020 at 12:25 PM
4 minute read
A worker severely injured by electrocution at a construction site was paid a $1.2 million settlement in his Essex County lawsuit, Zhindon v. Prestige Building Co., on April 24.
Plaintiff Jorge Zhindon was employed by Brazuka Construction and doing siding work at a residential worksite on Woodward Street in Jersey City on March 11, 2016. Zhindon and other workers were taking down a scaffold when a metal pole came in contact with overhead electrical wires. He suffered an electrical shock and was thrown several feet, according to his lawyers, John Ratkowitz and Michael Gallardo of Ginarte Gallardo Gonzalez & Winograd in Newark.
Zhindon was in cardiac arrest, and was revived onsite by emergency medial workers via CPR and defibrillation. He was hospitalized for a week at Jersey City Medical Center, and now has ongoing pain—from electrocution wounds to his head and right foot, as well as in his right leg and shoulder, the lawyers said. Zhindon underwent inpatient rehabilitation at Plaza Health Care and Rehabilitation Center for a week, and at Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation for three weeks. Now age 42, he has ongoing pain, symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder and anxiety, and double vision, and has also undergone outpatient physical therapy, they said.
Brazuka was subcontracted to work on the site by siding contractor Mayfair Remodeling, and Prestige Building Co. was the general contractor on the job. The suit, filed in Essex County based on the defendants doing business there, claimed Mayfair improperly allowed scaffolding to be constructed close to power lines. Brazuka was brought on well into the project, the lawyers noted.
The defense didn't dispute liability but did contest damages, contending that Zhindon's vision issue was not related to the accident, they said.
The parties settled on March 19, during mediation with Paul Vichness, a retired Superior Court judge with Mandelbaum Salsburg in Roseland. The sum was paid April 24, the lawyers said.
A trial had been scheduled for May 26, and the court was notified of the settlement on March 26, according to electronic court documents.
Prestige and Mayfair were represented by Michael J. Maselli and Douglas Sanchez of Cruser, Mitchell, Novitz, Sanchez, Gaston & Zimet in Woodcliff Lake. They couldn't be reached by phone or email.
— David Gialanella
|$650K in Middlesex Auto Case
Elliott v. Howland: A motorist who sustained shoulder and back injuries when his car was struck from behind by a truck settled his Middlesex County case on Feb. 14 for $650,000.
According to counsel in the case, on April 23, 2015, plaintiff Raymond Elliott, 27, was merging from Ridge Road onto Route 130 in South Brunswick when a box truck rear-ended his sedan. Elliott sued the truck driver, Warren Howland, claiming negligence, and Penske Truck Leasing Co., which owned the box truck.
Elliott was ultimately diagnosed with a partial tear of the right supraspinatus tendon, of his dominant arm, a herniation at lumbar intervertebral disc L5-S1; and bulging in his cervical spine. For the next three years, Elliott treated with chiropractic care, consulted an orthopedic surgeon and a pain management doctor, and received a series of epidural injections in his lower back. He underwent an arthroscopy to repair his rotator cuff tear and treated with physical therapy. Elliott alleged that he continues to experience pain and discomfort in his shoulder and lumbar spine, interfering with his performance of routine activities. Elliott sought to recover more than $200,000 in medical costs, plus damages for past and future pain and suffering.
The defense contended that the injuries Elliott suffered as a result of the accident would have been strains and sprains to his shoulder, neck and back, all of which would have resolved within weeks of treatment. A defense expert determined that Elliott's treatment was excessive and unrelated to the accident.
The parties negotiated a pretrial settlement. Penske, which was self-insured, agreed to pay $650,000.
Elliott was represented by Michael Heck of Epstein Ostrove. Daniel "Donny" Epstein, lead trial counsel, led settlement negotiations for the plaintiff. Bradley Ferencz, a retired judge, mediated the matter to its conclusion after several sessions. Howland and Penske Truck Leasing Co. were represented by Carl Figueroa of Cottrell Solensky.
*Editor's Comment: This report is based on information that was provided by plaintiff's and defense counsel.
— Aaron Jenkins, adapted from VerdictSearch reports
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTurning the Tables: Defense Litigators Embrace Lawsuits, Alleging Fraud at Plaintiffs Shops
6 minute readTitle Insurance Agency on Hot Seat Over Homebuyer Fees, Alleged Kickbacks
3 minute readNJ Justices Mull Insurer's Duty to Defend Employer's Negligence Claim in Workers' Comp Dispute
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
- 5Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250