Judge Approves $5.7M Settlement for Illegal Strip Searches at Essex County Jail
The Essex County counsel said the actual payout will likely come in at around $1.3 million.
July 08, 2020 at 03:21 PM
4 minute read
A federal judge in Newark has approved a $5.7 million settlement in a class action against Essex County over illegal strip searches at its correctional facility for people arrested on nonindictable offenses.
The suit claimed the county's blanket strip search policy violated the Fourth Amendment right to be free of unreasonable search and seizure. The suit also claimed the searches violated the New Jersey Civil Rights Law and the state strip search statute. The sole plaintiff and class representative, Lazaro Sanchez, who was charged with nonpayment of child support, was strip-searched before he was arraigned or given the opportunity to contest his detention, even though there was no particularized suspicion that he possessed drugs, weapons or other contraband, the suit claimed.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Leda Dunn Wettre granted final approval of the settlement on June 22. The settlement provides $325 to each class member, except those who were jailed on nonindictable drug offenses, who will receive $200. The settlement also provides for the county to pay $300,000 toward initial costs for notice and administration of the settlement, plus $800,000 for counsel fees and expenses, and a fee of $20,000 to Sanchez.
The plaintiffs and the class were represented by Lawrence Friscia of Newark, along with Albany, New York, attorney Elmer Keach III, and Charles LaDuca and Alexandra Warren of Cuneo, Gilbert & LaDuca in Washington.
Alan Ruddy and Lina Dedulin of the Essex County Counsel's Office represented the county. County Counsel Courtney Gaccione said that while the maximum size of the settlement is $5.7 million, the county's actual payout will likely come in at around $1.3 million. In addition, settlement administration costs are likely to come in at far less than $300,000, she said.
A total of 768 people, which is around 2.6% of potential class members, responded to a notice of settlement, which is far less than a typical response of 20% in such cases, said Gaccione. The exact amount of the settlement cost has yet to be determined, based on the two levels of compensation, and on calculation of child support obligations, she said. In addition, the county has changed its inmate search practices by installing scanner machines at the jail to check arrestees for contraband, she said.
Essex County halted its blanket strip search practice in January 2018 and agreed not to continue the practice in the future as long as the law does not change, the settlement agreement said. The county acknowledged that its change in practice was made, in part, because of the lawsuit.
The settlement covers strip searches from May 15, 2013, until Jan. 1, 2018. Class members were considered to be strip-searched if they were required to remove or rearrange their clothing for a visual inspection of their undergarments, buttocks, anus, genitals or breasts.
Wettre said no objections to the settlement were made going into a June 22 fairness hearing.
Given the size of the settlement, Wettre wrote, "this Court finds that the lack of objections is indicative of the fairness, reasonableness and adequacy of the settlement with the Defendants."
Litigation related to strip search practices in county jails has been a common theme in New Jersey. Similar allegations are raised in class actions that were filed on behalf of inmates at the Salem County Jail and the Camden County Jail. In 2018, a $1.5 million settlement was reached in a class action over illegal strip searches at the Burlington County Jail.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNJ Attorney General's Office Announces Major Shake-Up for Executive Leadership Team
4 minute read'Bewitched by the Technology': $300K to Settle Faulty Facial Recognition
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250