Liver Condition Linked to Dietary Supplement Leads to $2M Accord in Middlesex
A man who suffered liver failure after taking a dietary supplement agreed to a $2 million settlement in his Middlesex County products liability suit,…
July 09, 2020 at 11:40 AM
4 minute read
A man who suffered liver failure after taking a dietary supplement agreed to a $2 million settlement in his Middlesex County products liability suit, Viloria v. USP Labs, on April 27.
In the summer of 2013, Benjamin Viloria began taking a supplement called OxyElite that was sold as a safe way to gain muscle and lose weight, according to his attorney, Matthew Mendelsohn of Mazie, Slater, Katz & Freeman in Roseland. Viloria used the product for several months, until he began experiencing liver problems, he claimed. In October 2013, Viloria's liver failed, and he had to undergo an 11th-hour liver transplant, said Mendelsohn.
In November 2013, USP Labs of Dallas, maker of OxyElite, recalled the product, admitting that "[e]pidemiological evidence shows that use of [OxyElite] products has been associated with serious adverse health consequences, namely serious liver damage or acute liver failure," said Mendelsohn.
Before Viloria began using OxyElite, the Food and Drug Administration warned its manufacturer that its manufacturing process did not comply with best practices and violated the law. In 2013, reports emerged that OxyElite was linked to liver damage, and an FDA investigation found it was "adulterated," Mendelsohn said. The FDA ordered USP Labs to take OxyElite off the market, but the company instead claimed the liver injuries were caused by counterfeit versions of the drug, Mendelsohn said.
In April 2014, Viloria sued USP Labs, claiming the biopsy of his liver established that it failed due to OxyElite. In late 2015, the U.S. Department of Justice brought charges against USP Labs and several individuals in the Northern District of Texas. In January 2016, Viloria's suit was stayed pending the outcome of the criminal case, and the parties engaged in settlement discussions. In March 2019, USP Labs and five individuals pleaded guilty to felony charges in the criminal case, and in February 2020, the parties in the civil suit agreed to a $2 million settlement of Viloria's claims.
Viloria, now 49, has returned to work but will have to take medications for the rest of his life to prevent his body from rejecting the transplanted liver, and those drugs have their own side effects and complications, Mendelsohn said.
On April 27, the Department of Justice released funds that had been seized as part of the criminal charges for payment of the settlement, Mendelsohn said.
Pamela Lormand of Brewer Lormand in Dallas, who was national counsel for USP, and Glenn Goodier of Jones Walker in New Orleans, who was settlement counsel, did not respond to requests for comment.
— Charles Toutant
$1.7 Million in Essex Auto Case
Gaita v. Novikov: A motorist who sustained injuries when he was rear-ended by a commercial vehicle at a red light settled his Essex County suit, and was paid the $1.7 million settlement on May 8.
On July 29, 2015, plaintiff Anthony Gaita, then 26, was stopped at a red light at the intersection of 26th Street and Broadway in Fair Lawn when a commercial van, owned by Briad Restaurant Group and driven by company employee Vladimir Novikov, struck Gaita's vehicle from behind, according to documents and Gaita's attorney, Mark McBratney of Seigel Law in Ridgewood.
The accident occurred in Bergen County, but the suit was filed in Essex County based on the residence of Briad, which is headquartered in Livingston, according to electronic court documents. The complaint claimed Novikov was inattentive and negligently failed to stop for the red light.
Gaita claimed he sustained injuries to his cervical spine in the accident. He initially was treated with physical therapy and chiropractic care, but ultimately underwent a one-level discectomy and fusion at the cervical level in September 2016, McBratney said. Gaita later had to undergo a revision surgery in June 2018.
The defendants disputed causation and the permanency of Gaita's injuries, claiming his condition was attributable to a degenerative disc disease, according to McBratney. But, McBratney said, Gaita had no prior spinal issues.
The parties settled with Briad's primary insurer, Travelers Insurance Co., paying $1 million, and its excess carrier, National Surety Group, paying $700,000, McBratney said.
A stipulation of dismissal was filed with the court on April 8, according to electronic court documents.
The settlement was paid as of May 8, according to McBratney.
Michael A. Mourtzanakis of Morristown, an attorney with the Law Offices of James H. Rohlfing, represented the defendants. He didn't respond to a call and email about the case.
— David Gialanella
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![The 'Substantial Certainty' of Employer Liability Policies The 'Substantial Certainty' of Employer Liability Policies](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/b8/0b/d1952f014e508ba5d5b58cdc2958/injuried-worker2-767x633.jpg)
!['A More Nuanced Issue': NJ Supreme Court Considers Appellate Rules for Personal Injury Judgments 'A More Nuanced Issue': NJ Supreme Court Considers Appellate Rules for Personal Injury Judgments](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/njlawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/399/2024/01/Justices-Douglas-Fasciale-767x633.jpg)
'A More Nuanced Issue': NJ Supreme Court Considers Appellate Rules for Personal Injury Judgments
5 minute read![Appellate Division Rejects Third Circuit Interpretation of NJ Law, Says No Arbitration for Insurance Fraud Appellate Division Rejects Third Circuit Interpretation of NJ Law, Says No Arbitration for Insurance Fraud](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/njlawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/292/2022/10/Fraud-Investigation-767x633.jpg)
Appellate Division Rejects Third Circuit Interpretation of NJ Law, Says No Arbitration for Insurance Fraud
4 minute read![NJ Manufacturing Company Sues Insurer to Recoup PFAS Remediation Losses NJ Manufacturing Company Sues Insurer to Recoup PFAS Remediation Losses](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/njlawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/399/2023/07/water-pollution-sample-767x633.jpg)
NJ Manufacturing Company Sues Insurer to Recoup PFAS Remediation Losses
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Carol-Lisa Phillips to Rise to Broward Chief Judge as Jack Tuter Weighs Next Move
- 2Data Breaches in UK Legal Sector Surge, According to ICO Data
- 3Georgia Law Schools Seeing 24% More Applicants This Year
- 4After Shutting USAID, Trump Eyes Department of Education, CFPB
- 5‘Keep Men Out’: Female Swimmers Sue Ivy Leagues Over Lia Thomas’ Sweep
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250