BAR REPORT - Capitol Report
Election Day includes expanded voting pool; NJSBA collaborates on court reopening guidelines
July 13, 2020 at 08:00 AM
4 minute read
Election Day firsts include an expanded voting pool
As the ballots were counted in last week's primary election, they included votes cast by probationers and parolees for the first time in New Jersey history. The New Jersey State Bar Association (NJSBA) supported the legislation that expanded the voting pool last year, urging the bill's passage because of the disproportionate impact of the prohibition on people of color. The campaign to expand voting rights was championed by the New Jersey Institute for Social Justice (NJISJ) and its 1844 No More Campaign.
"Today was a historic day for democracy in New Jersey," said Henal Patel of NJISJ. "Today, 83,000 people have the right to vote and we continue to work toward full restoration."
NJSBA collaborates with workers' comp courts on COVID-19 safe reopening guidelines
Noting the steady leadership exhibited by the Workers' Compensation Division Director and Chief Judge Russell Wojtenko Jr. to address the safe administration of the workers' compensation courts during the current COVID-19 crisis, the NJSBA offered its assistance in planning for reopening and urged the director to include an NJSBA representative on the judge's task force that is planning for that endeavor.
"As you know, the Executive Committee of our Workers' Compensation Section has been meeting regularly to discuss these issues and stands ready to assist you in whatever way it can," wrote NJSBA President Kimberly A. Yonta in a letter to Wojtenko.
In response to a request for input from workers' compensation practitioners, the NJSBA also offered practical guidelines to address and encourage continued court operations to protect the safety and health of all involved. Those recommendations include:
- No in-person hearings should be held until such time as appropriate precautions are in place to ensure the health and safety of all users, except under the most extreme conditions and with the consent of all participants, with a phased-in approach to be implemented later.
- Consistent procedures should be adopted for handling matters across all venues so there is uniformity and expectations are the same from court to court.
- Digital hearings should continue with an option for telephone participation for injured workers who are unable to join by video, and requests by attorneys or witnesses to appear remotely should be granted liberally.
- The division should provide the platform to conduct telephone or video conferences. The NJSBA has offered to assist the division in scheduling a how-to seminar for new technology and procedures.
- Judges should be provided with laptops to ensure they have the ability to participate in video conferences.
- Sessions should be organized by type of matter, with settled matters being given morning segments and contested motions and trials scheduled for afternoons.
- Adjournment requests should be sent no later than three days prior to the court hearing or within as reasonable a timeframe as possible, and should be liberally granted when circumstances warrant, unless there is an objection. There should be a standard adjournment form from the division.
- For uniformity and efficiency of process, and for matters that require a hearing or conference, judges should try to assign specific times for the attorneys to call/video, and court reporters should be on the call/video.
- Settlements by affidavit should continue with the parties' consent.
This is a status report provided by the New Jersey State Bar Association on recently passed and pending legislation, regulations, gubernatorial nominations and/or appointments of interest to lawyers, as well as the involvement of the NJSBA as amicus in appellate court matters. To learn more, visit njsba.com.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNeighboring States Have Either Passed or Proposed Climate Superfund Laws—Is Pennsylvania Next?
7 minute readAn Overview of Proposed Changes to the Federal Rules of Procedure Relating to the Expansion of Remote Trial Testimony
15 minute readTrending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250