BAR REPORT - Capitol Report
Election Day includes expanded voting pool; NJSBA collaborates on court reopening guidelines
July 13, 2020 at 08:00 AM
4 minute read
Election Day firsts include an expanded voting pool
As the ballots were counted in last week's primary election, they included votes cast by probationers and parolees for the first time in New Jersey history. The New Jersey State Bar Association (NJSBA) supported the legislation that expanded the voting pool last year, urging the bill's passage because of the disproportionate impact of the prohibition on people of color. The campaign to expand voting rights was championed by the New Jersey Institute for Social Justice (NJISJ) and its 1844 No More Campaign.
"Today was a historic day for democracy in New Jersey," said Henal Patel of NJISJ. "Today, 83,000 people have the right to vote and we continue to work toward full restoration."
NJSBA collaborates with workers' comp courts on COVID-19 safe reopening guidelines
Noting the steady leadership exhibited by the Workers' Compensation Division Director and Chief Judge Russell Wojtenko Jr. to address the safe administration of the workers' compensation courts during the current COVID-19 crisis, the NJSBA offered its assistance in planning for reopening and urged the director to include an NJSBA representative on the judge's task force that is planning for that endeavor.
"As you know, the Executive Committee of our Workers' Compensation Section has been meeting regularly to discuss these issues and stands ready to assist you in whatever way it can," wrote NJSBA President Kimberly A. Yonta in a letter to Wojtenko.
In response to a request for input from workers' compensation practitioners, the NJSBA also offered practical guidelines to address and encourage continued court operations to protect the safety and health of all involved. Those recommendations include:
- No in-person hearings should be held until such time as appropriate precautions are in place to ensure the health and safety of all users, except under the most extreme conditions and with the consent of all participants, with a phased-in approach to be implemented later.
- Consistent procedures should be adopted for handling matters across all venues so there is uniformity and expectations are the same from court to court.
- Digital hearings should continue with an option for telephone participation for injured workers who are unable to join by video, and requests by attorneys or witnesses to appear remotely should be granted liberally.
- The division should provide the platform to conduct telephone or video conferences. The NJSBA has offered to assist the division in scheduling a how-to seminar for new technology and procedures.
- Judges should be provided with laptops to ensure they have the ability to participate in video conferences.
- Sessions should be organized by type of matter, with settled matters being given morning segments and contested motions and trials scheduled for afternoons.
- Adjournment requests should be sent no later than three days prior to the court hearing or within as reasonable a timeframe as possible, and should be liberally granted when circumstances warrant, unless there is an objection. There should be a standard adjournment form from the division.
- For uniformity and efficiency of process, and for matters that require a hearing or conference, judges should try to assign specific times for the attorneys to call/video, and court reporters should be on the call/video.
- Settlements by affidavit should continue with the parties' consent.
This is a status report provided by the New Jersey State Bar Association on recently passed and pending legislation, regulations, gubernatorial nominations and/or appointments of interest to lawyers, as well as the involvement of the NJSBA as amicus in appellate court matters. To learn more, visit njsba.com.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAppellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
4 minute readChiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
5 minute read'A Mockery' of Deposition Rules: Walgreens Wins Sanctions Dispute Over Corporate Witness Allegedly Unfamiliar With Company
$113K Sanction Award to Law Firm at Stake: NJ Supreme Court Will Consider 'Unsettled Law' Frivolous Litigation Question
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Cars Reach Record Fuel Economy but Largely Fail to Meet Biden's EPA Standard, Agency Says
- 2How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 3DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 4GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 5Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250