Gym That Defied State's COVID-19 Shutdown Order Held in Contempt, Faces Fines
As the state faces legal challenges to various measures intended to prevent the spread of COVID-19, Friday's ruling is an indicator that flouting those orders can have real consequences.
July 24, 2020 at 04:25 PM
4 minute read
A judge has found the owners of a gym in contempt of court for refusing to comply with a state-ordered shutdown during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Camden County Superior Court Judge Robert Lougy found Atilis Gym of Bellmawr in contempt Friday, and ordered the club to pay legal fees and court costs from the case, an amount to be decided later. The judge said the gym disregarded a July 1 order from State Health Commissioner Judith Persichilli directing Atilis Gym to stay closed and a July 20 court order enforcing Persichilli's order.
As the state faces legal challenges to various measures intended to prevent the spread of COVID-19, Friday's ruling is an indicator that flouting those orders can have real consequences.
"Today's ruling underscores that companies cannot disregard the governor's executive orders, which are designed to protect us all in the face of an unprecedented public health crisis," Attorney General Gurbir Grewal said in a statement. "While I wish it had not come to this, I am grateful that the court recognized the need for compliance. The vast majority of businesses and residents are following these rules and doing their part to keep their friends and neighbors safe, and those few companies who flout our executive orders are once again on notice that we will hold them accountable, and that there will be serious consequences for their actions."
The gym's attorney, James Mermigis of Syosset, New York, said in an email, "There was absolutely no proof presented that my clients were in violation of a court order. No certifications of witnesses were submitted and no evidence of anyone working out inside the gym was submitted as proof. The report stated that people were walking to and from the gym without masks. My clients cannot control whether people wear masks outside of their premises."
The Atilis Gym's owners filed their own suit in May to challenge the state's COVID-19 restrictions on gyms and health clubs, but withdrew it without prejudice on June 23 to pursue their remedies in state court.
Under Persichilli's order, Atilis and other gyms can open their doors for appointment-only, fitness instruction to an individual, and that individual's immediate family members, household members or romantic partners. If multiple sessions take place, they must be in different rooms or separated by floor-to-ceiling partitions, the order states.
After gym owners Frank Trumbetti and Ian Smith said in media interviews that they would not abide by the judge's order, inspectors from the state Department of Health attempted to inspect Atilis Gym, accompanied by police officers on July 22. But the owners did not allow the inspection. Trumbetti and Smith told the inspectors that "everyone within the gym are considered romantic partners," according to court papers.
The inspectors reported that staff at Atilis Gym were not provided masks or protective equipment, use of masks by patrons is not required, and no patrons were seen wearing masks. The inspectors said the gym had covered its windows with paper to block the view inside, that Trumbetti and Smith confirmed no private classes were offered, and no floor-to-ceiling partitions were installed.
On that same day, the Camden County Prosecutor's Office placed the gym under surveillance. During a four-and-half-hour surveillance session, 72 people were seen entering the gym, but only two were wearing masks. Only 10 of the 72 arrived in pairs, and the rest came individually, in separate vehicles.
During two hours of surveillance in the late afternoon, 33 people entered the gym, with 10 seen donning masks. Eleven of the 33 came in groups of two or three, according to the surveillance report.
The state's lawyers told Lougy that it's unlikely that those patrons were receiving individual training sessions, since Trumbetti and Smith have said they are the gym's only employees, and it's unlikely that those arriving are members of the same family or romantic partners, since most arrived in separate vehicles.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The Tobacco Industry of This Decade': Slew of Class Actions Accuse DraftKings of Creating Addicts
5 minute readSports Attorney Rejoins Jets for Second Tour of Duty as GC
Trending Stories
- 1ACC CLO Survey Waves Warning Flags for Boards
- 2States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 3Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 4Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 5Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250