BAR REPORT - Capitol Report
NJSBA-backed remote notary bill makes another appearance in Legislature, passes out of Assembly committee
July 29, 2020 at 10:40 AM
4 minute read
The New Jersey Assembly Judiciary Committee voted out of committee A-4250 (Downey)/S-2508 (Gopal), which would revise the law regarding notaries and notarial acts and authorizes electronic signatures. The bill – dubbed the remote notary bill – was passed in a temporary form earlier this year to address emergent needs arising from the COVID-19 Executive Orders restricting personal contact. The New Jersey State Bar Association (NJSBA) supported the predecessor bill and generally supports the permanent bill.
"At the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, it was challenging for many New Jersey residents to get documents notarized and move forward with legal and financial transactions because notarial services needed to be performed in person," said Assemblywoman Joann Downey, sponsor of the bill. "Since we amended the law, it's become much easier for residents to safely access this essential service."
The bill was passed with significant amendments that addressed many of NJSBA's concerns, including removing the prohibition on using remote notaries for wills and codicils. However, additional amendments were sought to remove those prohibitions in family law matters. Key provisions were removed from the bill, including penalties on those posing as notaries and offering legal services. This was viewed as an important provision to tamp down on notario fraud, in which individuals improperly provide immigration services that can only be performed by an attorney or an accredited representative of the Department of Justice.
The bill is a result of the work of the New Jersey Law Revision Commission, which amended the Uniform Law Commission's 2010 and 2018 revisions of the Revised Uniform Law on Notarial Acts. The bill heads to a full vote in the Assembly and is pending in the Senate Judiciary Committee. The NJSBA continues to monitor this bill.
|Bill expediting marriage licenses passes committee
A measure that provides for the immediate issuance of marriage and civil union licenses and provides for a 72-hour waiting period prior to the ceremony was voted out of the Assembly Judiciary Committee last week. A-2717 (Murphy)/S-2219 (Gopal) is supported by the NJSBA, which pointed out that the bill streamlines the process by limiting the burden for couples to make additional trips to licensing offices to pick up licenses.
In addition to providing for the immediate issuance of a license, the bill imposes a 72-hour waiting period for a marriage or civil union ceremony. Couples may seek a waiver by applying to the Superior Court for an order in cases of an emergency or for applicants who are active duty members of the Armed Forces of the United States or the National Guard.
The bill passed the Assembly in the last session but stalled in the Senate. The bill awaits a full vote in the Assembly this session and remains pending in the Senate Judiciary Committee.
|Professional license bill removing requirement proving lawful U.S. presence moves forward
A-4225 (Mukherji)/S-2455 (Pou) prohibiting the requirement proving lawful presence in the United States as a qualification for obtaining a professional or occupational license was voted out of the Assembly Judiciary Committee last week. The NJSBA supports the measure as a necessary measure to advance New Jersey's workforce, providing support to fill labor shortages and providing expertise.
The bill heads to a full vote in the Senate and Assembly.
This is a status report provided by the New Jersey State Bar Association on recently passed and pending legislation, regulations, gubernatorial nominations and/or appointments of interest to lawyers, as well as the involvement of the NJSBA as amicus in appellate court matters. To learn more, visit njsba.com.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNJ Attorney General's Office Announces Major Shake-Up for Executive Leadership Team
4 minute read'Bewitched by the Technology': $300K to Settle Faulty Facial Recognition
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Cars Reach Record Fuel Economy but Largely Fail to Meet Biden's EPA Standard, Agency Says
- 2How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 3DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 4GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 5Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250