When a borrower defaults under a mortgage loan, the lender might consider options such as temporary forbearance, negotiating a workout or commencing a foreclosure action. Upon weighing the various alternatives, the parties might elect to enter into a deed in lieu of foreclosure transaction, whereby the borrower voluntarily delivers a deed conveying the mortgaged property to the lender. Such a transaction could have advantages for both parties. For instance, the lender could gain control over its collateral more quickly and inexpensively than it otherwise might have with a foreclosure proceeding. For the borrower, a proposed deed in lieu of foreclosure presents an opportunity to negotiate releases from liability and to avoid some of the negative impacts associated with having a public foreclosure proceeding on its record.

However, these transactions are not without risk. One of the dangers facing a lender in a deed in lieu of foreclosure transaction is that a court might recharacterize it as an equitable mortgage, instead of a true conveyance of title. To help frame the issue, this article analyzes recent New Jersey jurisprudence in this area and potential mitigants against this risk.

Equitable Mortgages

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]