In August, two federal courts of appeal held that school boards that adopted policies barring transgender (or gender-affirmed) students from using the restrooms that matched their gender identity violated both the Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection and Title IX’s prohibition of sex discrimination. See Adams v. School Board of St. Johns County, Florida, 2020 WL 456181 (11th Cir. Aug. 7, 2020), at http://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/201813592.pdf; Grimm v. Gloucester County School Board, 2020 WL 5034430 (4th Cir. Aug. 26, 2020), at https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinions/191952.P.pdf. These decisions add to the near unanimous string of recent decisions reaching the same result.

Both courts provide a rich history of the discrimination and hostility that students such as Drew Adams and Gavin Grimm have confronted simply for trying to live their lives in accordance with their gender identity, which is considered the most important of the elements (e.g., chromosomes, gonads, and hormones) that determine a person’s sex. Both courts also debunked the various rationales each school district used to justify their policies.The Fourth Circuit closed its opinion by observing:

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]