A wirer of funds to an attorney trust account sued a law firm for breach of fiduciary duty and conversion when the firm’s client defrauded the transferor. There is no liability, however, according to the New Jersey Supreme Court, where the law firm had no knowledge of the transferor’s existence or any agreement of the transferor and its client, had no contact with the transferor, and made no representations to the transferor.

In Moshe Meisels v. Fox Rothschild LLP, an intermediary entity on behalf of Moshe Meisels, a London real estate investor, wired in two stages almost $2.5 million to the attorney trust account of Fox Rothschild, which represented Eliyahu Weinstein. Meisels and Weinstein were involved in a deal to purchase real estate in Irvington, New Jersey. The wire transfers did not identify Meisels as the owner of the funds and communicated no limiting instructions or explanation from Meisels or the intermediary. Indeed, prior to the onset of the litigation, the firm had no knowledge of Meisels’ existence. Meisels had had no communication with the transactional lawyer in charge of the file or anyone else at the law firm.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]