![Appellate Division Judge Carmen Messano/photo by Carmen Natale/ALM](http://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/399/2020/07/Carmen-Messano-Article-202007231547.jpg)
Legal Malpractice Case Offers Guidance on Personal Jurisdiction
The Appellate Division has provided for the bench and bar a detailed and valuable compendium of the criteria for determining if a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction should be granted or denied.
November 25, 2020 at 03:23 PM
3 minute read
The case of Kenneth Zahl v. Hiram Eastland, Jr. et al. (decided by the Appellate Division on October 22, 2020), involves a New Jersey resident who retained a Mississippi lawyer to serve as co-counsel with a New Jersey lawyer in connection with a pending New Jersey federal court suit. The Mississippi lawyer filed a motion in the federal court for admission pro hac vice. After certifying that he was familiar with the federal local rules and the New Jersey Rules of Professional Conduct and that he would comply with the requirements of the same, the federal court granted the motion. In due course, the federal suit was dismissed, and Kenneth Zahl filed a suit in the Superior Court of New Jersey alleging that Hiram Eastland committed legal malpractice and that he had overbilled in connection with what turned out to be the unsuccessful federal lawsuit. Eastland then moved to dismiss the action for lack of personal jurisdiction. The trial judge denied the motion in what Judge Messano, writing for the Appellate Division, described as a "comprehensive written opinion." The Appellate Division affirmed.
The trial judge had applied the standard that is used under Rule 4:6-2 (e) for determining if a complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The Appellate Division stated that the trial judge had erred in applying that standard but that the balance of the trial judge's opinion "…evidenced an understanding of the principles governing the exercise of personal jurisdiction." The Appellate Division referred to prior cases which explained that "'…it is only the jurisdictional allegations that are relevant, not the sufficiency of the allegations respecting the cause of action.'" (citation omitted).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Bring NJ's 'Pretrial Opportunity Program' into the Open Bring NJ's 'Pretrial Opportunity Program' into the Open](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/8f/58/bc6d396a475dae95863977b92b68/released-767x633.jpg)
![Social Media Policy for Judges Provides Guidance in a Changing World Social Media Policy for Judges Provides Guidance in a Changing World](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/14/5a/e76bf7bd45fdbb655d1d58c95cb8/bauchner-2-767x633.jpg)
Social Media Policy for Judges Provides Guidance in a Changing World
3 minute read![Bank of America's Cash Sweep Program Attracts New Legal Fire in Class Action Bank of America's Cash Sweep Program Attracts New Legal Fire in Class Action](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/newyorklawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2022/11/Bank-of-America-Sign01-767x633.jpg)
Bank of America's Cash Sweep Program Attracts New Legal Fire in Class Action
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1ACC CLO Survey Waves Warning Flags for Boards
- 2States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 3Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 4Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 5Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250