Attorneys are “held to an even higher degree of responsibility” than vendors in a typical commercial transaction, which requires the attorney to generally explain to a client the benefits and disadvantages of arbitrating a prospective dispute between the attorney and client, said a unanimous Supreme Court in Delaney v. Dickey, Docket No. A-30-19. The decision, handed down on Dec. 21, prospectively imposes this obligation on attorneys who include an arbitration clause in their retainer agreements.
The New Jersey State Bar Association (NJSBA) participated as amicus in the matter to urge the Supreme Court to reverse an Appellate Division decision expanding the requirements of the Rules of Professional Conduct to require such explanation. The NJSBA noted any such expansion should be done through the rulemaking process and should be applied only after attorneys are put on notice.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
