BAR REPORT - Capitol Report
NJ Supreme Court invites comments about plan to raise implicit bias awareness with new model charges and voir dire
February 08, 2021 at 08:01 AM
3 minute read
The New Jersey Supreme Court has issued proposals for model voir dire questions and updates to the model civil and criminal jury charges for comment. The proposals were written to "support juror impartiality through awareness of implicit bias." The New Jersey State Bar Association (NJSBA) has previously supported implicit bias training for jurors and is reviewing the current proposals.
The proposals are a result of the Court's Working Group on Juror Impartiality, which was empaneled "to focus on practical steps that can be implemented to improve fairness in the jury selection and deliberation process." The group included judges and judicial representatives of the Criminal Practice Committee, Committee on Jury Selection and Civil Practice Committee.
Among the proposals are:
|- Supplementing the existing juror orientation process with a concise video about bias, including both explicit and implicit bias
- The inclusion of two voir dire questions to be posed in both civil and criminal trials, to be asked during the open-ended portion of the voir dire and in addition to other open-ended questions:
- In the juror orientation video and my introductory remarks, the concept of implicit bias was defined and discussed. Do you think you will be able to decide the case fairly and impartially and not be affected by any biases you may have—explicit or implicit? Please explain.
- Some of the witnesses, parties, lawyers, jurors or other people involved with this case may have personal characteristics (such as their race, ethnicity, or religion) or backgrounds different from yours, or they may be similar to yours. Would those differences or similarities make it difficult for you to decide this case impartially based solely on the evidence and the law? Please explain.
- With regard to the model jury charges, the proposal is to add content to three of the charges: 1) preliminary instructions, 2) instructions after being sworn, and 3) final instructions. This content would reinforce the importance of impartiality, including through ongoing awareness of implicit biases and how they can affect consideration of jurors' thought processes and decision-making.
The full proposals can be found at njcourts.gov. Comments on the proposals must be sent in writing by March 12. They may be sent by mail to: Glenn A. Grant, J.A.D.; Acting Administrative Director of the Courts; Comments on Proposed Juror Impartiality Initiatives; Hughes Justice Complex; P.O. Box 037; Trenton, NJ 08625-0037
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAppellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
4 minute readChiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
5 minute read'A Mockery' of Deposition Rules: Walgreens Wins Sanctions Dispute Over Corporate Witness Allegedly Unfamiliar With Company
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250