The apportionment of damages in “second injury” cases has always been difficult. How to fairly allocate damages and how to charge a jury on the determinative standard. The issue runs through common law, the Joint Tortfeasors Contribution Act (JTCA) and the Comparative Negligence Act (CNA).

The Appellate Division recently addressed the issue in Glassman v. Friedel. The Glassman solution is to allocate liability and causal relationship on a percentage basis so that no party in the second injury suit becomes financially liable for more than the damages it actually causes, and each tortfeasor pays for the harm it actually caused. Glassman’s two-step process concentrates on fair and adequate payment, whether that sum is less than or exceeds the amount for which a plaintiff might have settled against the person charged with the initial injuries.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]