When does a prosecutor go too far in a summation to the jury, thereby prejudicing the defendant’s right to a fair trial? That was the question addressed by the Supreme Court in the recent case of State v. Damon Williams (A-46-19), decided Jan. 19, 2021. The defendant had walked into a bank in Merchantville, New Jersey, carrying a bag, wearing a sweat shirt, dark pants, a New York Giants hat and sunglasses. He walked up to a teller’s window and presented a note to the teller that said, “Please, all the money, 100, 50, 20, 10. Thank you.” He was then given $4,600 (rejecting a pack of $20 bills containing a GPS tracker and a device that would trigger a silent alarm) and left the bank.

Williams was apprehended several weeks later, apparently as a result of fingerprint evidence that had been found on the note. He was indicted for second-degree robbery, a crime defined in N.J.S.A. 2C:15-1(a)(2) as theft using force or the threat of force. The principal legal issue at trial was whether Williams was guilty of second-degree robbery or the lesser included offense of third-degree theft (defined in N.J.S.A. 2C:20-3(a) as exercising unlawful control over the “movable property of another with purpose to deprive him thereof.”).

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]