Retroactive Tax Legislation and Gift Planning in 2021
With a Democratic majority now settled into Washington, estate planners are contemplating the potential impact on the estate and gift tax exemption previously increased by the preceding Republican administration.
March 18, 2021 at 02:00 PM
9 minute read
With a Democratic majority now settled into Washington, estate planners are contemplating the potential impact on the estate and gift tax exemption previously increased by the preceding Republican administration. Whether any changes to the estate and gift tax exemption will be made in the near future remains speculative, but the possibility of retroactive legislation has estate planners on high alert. Many clients made gifts in 2020 in anticipation of the "Blue Wave," and many more will continue to make gifts this year, taking advantage of the current $11,700,000 federal estate and gift tax exemption which is scheduled to sunset on Dec. 31, 2025, under current federal law. What happens if a client made gifts that exceed a retroactive change to the estate and gift tax exemption? With careful planning, clients may be able to take advantage of the current enhanced estate and gift tax exemption and avoid gift tax.
Biden Estate and Gift Tax Proposals
During the 2020 campaign, the Biden administration originally proposed lowering the federal estate and gift tax exemption to $5,000,000 for individuals ($10,000,000 for married couples), and later proposed to restore the exemption to 2009 levels of $3,500,000 for individuals ($7,000,000 for married couples) for estate taxes and $1,000,000 for gift taxes ($2,000,000 for married couples). The most recent Biden proposal released last fall also includes increasing the top estate and gift tax rate from 40% to 45%, and repealing the step-up in basis at death on capital gains exceeding $100,000. The repeal of the step-up in basis will likely mean that death will be treated as a realization event, thereby triggering tax on unrealized capital gains at death. Capital gains are also proposed to be taxed at an increased ordinary income tax rate 39.6% for taxpayers with income above $1,000,000.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRetiring AOC Director Judge Glenn A. Grant Walks Away From Judiciary 'Tremendously Impressed' by New Jersey's Judges
5 minute readDisciplinary Board Criticizes Ethics Panel for Dismissing Charges Over Improper Firm Name
4 minute readIdeas We Should Borrow: A Legislative Wishlist for NJ Trusts and Estates
14 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gunderson Dettmer Opens Atlanta Office With 3 Partners From Morris Manning
- 2Decision of the Day: Court Holds Accident with Post Driver Was 'Bizarre Occurrence,' Dismisses Action Brought Under Labor Law §240
- 3Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 4Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 5Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250