New Jersey State Bar Association (NJSBA) Trustee Brian J. Neary argued on behalf of the NJSBA before the state Supreme Court last week, contending that virtual participation of grand jurors is unconstitutional because of the lack of secrecy and impediments to due process. The matter of State v. Vega-Larregui is before the Supreme Court to determine whether virtual grand jury trials may proceed. The NJSBA participated as amicus curiae, and Neary and NJSBA Trustee Christopher J. Keating authored the brief.
Vega-Larregui’s attorneys argued that the virtual participation of grand jurors hampered the defendant’s proceeding, while the state maintained that the process was in good faith. The NJSBA argued that virtual grand juries are unconstitutional and raised concerns about the proper utilization of technology during this “sacred process.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
