U.S. Chamber of Commerce in Washington, D.C. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
A federal judge’s ruling striking New Jersey’s restrictions on mandatory arbitration agreements in employment is an indicator that a movement opposing such measures has hit a brick wall.
The ruling serves as a reminder of a deep divide in views about mandatory arbitration clauses in employment and how any efforts to regulate such clauses face an uphill battle in court.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
