To no one's surprise, in late March, a New Jersey federal district judge held that New Jersey's 2019 amendment to the Law Against Discrimination, in N.J.S.A. 10-5:12.7, conflicted with and thus was preempted by the pro-arbitration policy of the Federal Arbitration Act to the extent the amendment [to the LAD] purported to prohibit enforcement of pre-dispute agreements in employment contracts as "against public policy." The attorney general was, therefore, enjoined from attempting to enforce that part of the LAD. N.J. Civil Justice Institute v. Grewal, No. 19-17518, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57437 (D.N.J. Mar. 25, 2021). We suggest that this is not the end of the battle against pre-dispute agreements for arbitration in the employment context, though the opponents of such agreements do have an uphill battle.