Earlier this month, the state Supreme Court Committee on the Unauthorized Practice of Law modified an earlier opinion regarding nonlawyers who represent parents and children in special education proceedings before the Office of Administrative Law (OAL). Opinion 57 supersedes an opinion stating that nonlawyers with knowledge or training with respect to children with disabilities and their educational needs “may advise, represent and/or speak on behalf of parents and children at meetings with the child’s school to develop the child’s IEP and at formal mediations should the parties be unable to agree to the IEP.”
The committee further outlined the requirements of nonlawyers who represent parents or children with disabilities in OAL-contested special education cases. They must be qualified, submit an application, and not charge a fee for the representation. While the committee noted there is no certification process for such advocates, the written “Notice of Appearance/Application” must include an explanation certifying how the representative has knowledge or training with respect to handicapped pupils and their educational needs, and include relevant education, work experience or other qualifications.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
