![Judge-Chair](http://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/399/2021/05/Judge-Chair-Article-202105271344.jpg)
Young Lawyers Feel Ripple Effect of Judicial Vacancies and Case Delays
With the perfect storm of COVID-19 closures, an astronomical backlog of cases, and significant judicial vacancies across the state, the emerging attorney's obstacles to gaining courtroom experience seem insurmountable.
May 28, 2021 at 10:00 AM
6 minute read
With the advent of COVID-19 and the abrupt halt of in-person court appearances came sweeping changes to the practice of law. The experience of new and young lawyers is no exception. As lawyers in their early years of practice look to the future, they see the upward trajectory of their careers waver. Prior to the global pandemic, obtaining in-person court experience was becoming increasingly difficult. Developing attorneys in all practice areas were familiar with being shut out of significant courtroom experiences because of lack of opportunity or reluctance by carriers, clients, or senior counsel to assign them.
Now, with the perfect storm of COVID-19 closures, an astronomical backlog of cases, and significant judicial vacancies across the state, the emerging attorney's obstacles to gaining courtroom experience seem insurmountable. The resolution of tens of thousands of cases across every area of law have been delayed. This stagnation has caused a ripple effect through the entire legal industry, reaching even the most junior attorney. At a time when 87,000 cases are in backlog, judicial vacancies flicker between 14% and 20% of the bench, and it is taking anywhere from 16 to 24 months to fill these vacancies, the future of courtroom experience for new and young lawyers seems especially grim.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All!['Younger and Invigorated Bench': Biden's Legacy in New Jersey Federal Court 'Younger and Invigorated Bench': Biden's Legacy in New Jersey Federal Court](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/7a/8c/ad1d81c14b3da4c23b0991f05264/us-district-court-for-the-district-of-new-jersey-767x633-1.jpg)
'Younger and Invigorated Bench': Biden's Legacy in New Jersey Federal Court
5 minute read![Battles Won, Others Abandoned: 2024 Brought Big Change to the Judiciary Battles Won, Others Abandoned: 2024 Brought Big Change to the Judiciary](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/njlawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/292/2020/04/Hughes-Justice-Complex-Article-201801231805.jpg)
Battles Won, Others Abandoned: 2024 Brought Big Change to the Judiciary
6 minute read![Will 2025 Bring a Change to Lawyers' Mandatory Pro Bono Duties Under 'Madden'? Will 2025 Bring a Change to Lawyers' Mandatory Pro Bono Duties Under 'Madden'?](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/2a/33/985f82d34836863dcb8f4959e66d/2024-pro-bono-f1-display-767x633.jpg)
Will 2025 Bring a Change to Lawyers' Mandatory Pro Bono Duties Under 'Madden'?
7 minute read![Judges Push for Action to Combat Increasing Threats Against Judiciary Judges Push for Action to Combat Increasing Threats Against Judiciary](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2023/05/Philadelphia-City-Hall-05-767x633.jpg)
Judges Push for Action to Combat Increasing Threats Against Judiciary
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Exceptional Growth Becoming the Rule? Demand and Rate Hikes Drove Strong Year for Big Law
- 2Dentons Taps D.C. Capital Markets Attorney for New US Managing Partner
- 3Auto Dealers Ask Court to Pump the Brakes on Scout Motors’ Florida Sales
- 4German Court Orders X to Release Data Amid Election Interference Concerns
- 5Litigation Trends to Watch From Law.com Radar: Suits Strike at DEI Policies, 'Meme Coins' and Infractions in Cannabis Labeling
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250