BAR REPORT - Capitol Report
State bar to testify on rule amendments and committee reports
May 31, 2021 at 08:02 AM
6 minute read
NJSBA to Testify on Rule Amendments and Committee Reports
The New Jersey State Bar Association (NJSBA) is expected to testify before the state Supreme Court on Tuesday regarding several rule amendments and committee reports on complementary dispute resolution; criminal practice; diversity, inclusion and community engagement; rules of evidence; family practice; and municipal court practice. The Court will also address the recently released report of the Special Committee on Landlord Tenant. The NJSBA submitted comments to a number of reports, and members will be appearing virtually on its behalf in support of its comments.
Report of the Committee on Rules of Evidence
Former NJSBA Trustee Craig Hubert and President-elect Jeralyn L. Lawrence are expected to testify on behalf of the NJSBA regarding N.J.R.E. 803(c) (27) and the collaborative law privilege. The NJSBA generally supports the proposed rule change, which seeks to clarify that a prior statement by a child must be found trustworthy by a preponderance of the evidence to be admitted. The rule change amends the current standard that is based on probability. There is a concern, however, that the rule's prohibition against disqualification of a child witness by virtue of any of the competency requirements of Rule 601, without delineating any of its subsections, should remain intact and not be limited to just subsection (b) of Rule 601.
Lawrence will testify regarding the collaborative law privilege. The NJSBA objects to the committee's rejection of this privilege. The NJSBA submitted this section to the committee to codify into the evidence rules, which have been enacted by statute. The proposed section follows the model of the mediator privilege, which was codified following the enactment of the Uniform Mediation Act in 2004. The Collaborative Law Act was enacted in 2014 to recognize the dispute resolution method known as family collaborative law. An evidentiary privilege was included in the statute to protect participants from the disclosure of any communication during this process, similar to a mediator's privilege. The NJSBA seeks to incorporate a similar privilege that would "allow participants to engage candidly in the process to facilitate resolution."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Trending Stories
- 1Eliminating Judicial Exceptions: The Promise of the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act
- 2AI in Legal: Disruptive Potential and Practical Realities
- 3One Court’s Opinion on Successfully Bankruptcy Proofing a Borrower
- 4Making the Case for Workflow Automation
- 5Copyright Infringement by Generative AI Tools Under US and UK Law: Common Threads and Contrasting Approaches
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
