BAR REPORT - Judiciary Landlord-Tenant Report
NJSBA weighs in on Judiciary landlord-tenant report
June 14, 2021 at 10:31 AM
4 minute read
A growing concern about an avalanche of landlord-tenant matters expected after the moratorium on evictions expires in New Jersey was among the catalysts that prompted the New Jersey Supreme Court to create a special committee to reexamine longstanding court practices and procedures on landlord-tenant matters and make recommendations.
The NJSBA Board of Trustees recently agreed with the majority of the special committee's proposed changes to the process for handling tenant matters, but approved submitting some suggested alterations based on comments from several NJSBA committees and sections. In addition, NJSBA Trustee Janice Heinold and Bruce Gudin were among 18 attorneys representing tenants, landlords and other stakeholders who sat on a committee chaired by Acting Administrative Director Glenn A. Grant to review new procedures for landlord-tenant court drafted by the Judiciary.
In a letter to Grant, NJSBA President Domenick Carmagnola wrote that the NJSBA believes the process set forth by the special committee "increases access to the judicial system, is fair to all parties and treats litigants with dignity and respect."
The havoc the pandemic created also affected the housing market, with millions losing their jobs and unable to pay rent or becoming sick with COVID-19 and unable to work and pay rent.
In March 2020, at the start of the pandemic, Gov. Phil Murphy issued an executive order that prohibited landlords from evicting tenants. Although the infection rate has slowed and the state has begun reopening, recent legislation extended the governor's executive order on evictions until Jan. 1, 2022, but that date could change under pending legislation.
Under the moratorium, landlords can still file complaints for possession for evictions in landlord tenant court, but no evictions can take place. Monetary damages under $15,000 could still be filed in the Special Civil Part.
As of March, there were 52,000 pending eviction filings. That number is expected to swell to over 200,000 sometime between now and the end of the year, according to the Judiciary.
The Judiciary report recommended changes to the process that include establishing a case management conference and settlement conference before a hearing and trial in landlord-tenant court.
Carmagnola noted in his letter that the process "may take a little longer," but "both landlords and tenants will benefit from a structured exchange of information, enhanced opportunities for resolution and, if need be, a more focused trial."
Under the new procedures, the landlord and tenant are required to appear at a case management conference to review the landlord's complaint and proof, and hear the tenant's defense. If one or both of the parties fail to show up, the conference will be rescheduled.
At the settlement conference, a neutral third party, called a landlord-tenant legal specialist, will try to settle the matter before it goes to trial. Before the pandemic, an attempt to settle the matter would normally happen on the hearing date, Heinold said.
"Before the pandemic, if you filed for eviction, you could expect a hearing date in three or four weeks. Now, with the new process, it's probably going to be 60 to 90 days," said Heinold, a partner at Raymond Coleman Heinold in Moorestown, where her practice includes landlord-tenant law.
"The addition of the conferences is an attempt to get cases settled before a hearing date because otherwise the system is just going to be overwhelmed," she said.
The large number of expected filings indicates "there is clearly a crisis that is going to occur for the court, for the community, for landlords and for tenants," she said. The goal was to make the process fair to all litigants, said Diane K. Smith, a former NJSBA trustee who was a trustee liaison to the NJSBA Special Civil Part and Pro Bono committees and Access to Justice Subcommittee of the Pandemic Task Force, which reviewed the Judiciary report.
The goal was to make the process fair to all litigants, Smith said.
"More than 98% of tenants are unrepresented in court, while 83% of landlords are represented. So, this process will even the playing field. The hope is that the process will give more opportunities for a fair resolution to the matter. It means tenants don't lose their homes and landlords get paid, which is a good thing for everybody," she said.
Heinold noted that "Judge Grant said it's not a system set in stone. The court is going to try this and, where needed, make modifications and be willing to revisit it. The system has been in place since the 1950s, so it was probably time for an update."
The NJSBA also recommended that the Judiciary engage in community outreach to educate individuals about what to expect in landlord-tenant proceedings and where to find resources for assistance. The Association committed to doing the same within the legal community and the community at large.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![What You Need to Know About the New Jersey Flood Risk Notification Law What You Need to Know About the New Jersey Flood Risk Notification Law](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/399/2024/04/FLOOD-INSURANCE-Application-767x633.jpg)
![NJ Appellate Division: Class Action Waiver Unenforceable Absent Mandatory Arbitration Agreement NJ Appellate Division: Class Action Waiver Unenforceable Absent Mandatory Arbitration Agreement](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/399/2021/12/bigstock-Class-signs-and-people-or-stud-101248805-767x633.jpg)
NJ Appellate Division: Class Action Waiver Unenforceable Absent Mandatory Arbitration Agreement
5 minute read![Trade Secrets Dispute Among 'Eviction Services' Providers Enters Superior Court Trade Secrets Dispute Among 'Eviction Services' Providers Enters Superior Court](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/399/2021/08/Eviction-notice-767x633.jpg)
Trade Secrets Dispute Among 'Eviction Services' Providers Enters Superior Court
![Former Property Manager Not Liable for Subsequent Injury Former Property Manager Not Liable for Subsequent Injury](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/399/2023/03/Apartment-building_3-767x633.jpg)
Trending Stories
- 1Eliminating Judicial Exceptions: The Promise of the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act
- 2AI in Legal: Disruptive Potential and Practical Realities
- 3One Court’s Opinion on Successfully Bankruptcy Proofing a Borrower
- 4Making the Case for Workflow Automation
- 5Copyright Infringement by Generative AI Tools Under US and UK Law: Common Threads and Contrasting Approaches
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250